No way. Martial arts started in Lemuria.Brazil is deeply religious.
But regardless china didnt invent martial arts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No way. Martial arts started in Lemuria.Brazil is deeply religious.
But regardless china didnt invent martial arts.
whats debatable, ?Thats all debatable. Maby for a few hundred years there at one point. Which isnt really a major point in the 40,000 odd years of martial arts.
Day one. There was always somebody who knew a few things,whats debatable, ?
why have you chosen 40,000 years, humans have been around and fighting each other for 200,000 years.. The question is when did fighting become an art, rather than a evolutionary necessity ?
Dancing was a way to practice; so, the day they invented dancing.
But, man, was he pissed.Thought dancing was invented when alcohol was and someone stepped on the fire?
But, man, was he pissed.
whats debatable, ?
why have you chosen 40,000 years, humans have been around and fighting each other for 200,000 years.. The question is when did fighting become an art, rather than a evolutionary necessity ?
how do you expect them to have recorded it 200,000 years ago. How are you claiming they recorded it 50,000 year agoBecause without looking it up the first recorded depictions of systemised martial arts training is about 50,000 years. So I gave myself 10,000 as a bit of leeway
According to some scientist, human beings, as we understand them, somehow, only came into existence, at the 50,000 year mark. Anything before that is not related to homo-sapiens; however, they may have been intelligent Nephlim Cone-heads, but they were not related to homo-sapiens.how do you have expected them to rec
how do you expect them to have recorded it 200,000 years ago. How are you claiming they recorded it 50,000 year ago
which scientist are those, the consensus seems to be 200,000 . And going backwards as they make more findsAccording to some scientist, human beings, as we understand them, somehow, only came into existence, at the 50,000 year mark. Anything before that is not related to homo-sapiens; however, they may have been intelligent Nephlim Cone-heads, but they were not related to homo-sapiens.
They aren't finding humans. Even if you found a live Neanderthal today, he wouldn't be human.which scientist are those, the consensus seems to be 200,000 . And going backwards as they make more finds
well yes they are, have you some reputable source for the assertions that humans only appeared 50,000'years ago.They aren't finding humans.
I will look but, you have to understand Europe was not populated by humans, but by humanoids with different behaviors, and hunting patterns. They don't even know if there eyes were round, or in slits. They are gonna find this stuff, and keep finding it, but Homosapien People, you will not find before the 50,000 mark.well yes they are, have you some reputable source for the assertions that humans only appeared 50,000'years ago.
which scientist are those, the consensus seems to be 200,000 . And going backwards as they make more finds
Yeah, he would. Humans are classed as genus HOMO. The earliest found (so far) is Homo habilis, who shows up nearly three million years ago. Through evolution, anatomically modern humans started showing up about 200k years ago and through continuing evolution became Homo sapiens about 50k years ago. There is evidence that H. sapiens encountered H. neanderthalensis repeatedly during the expansion eras, and the presence of Neanderthal genomes in H. sapiens indicates that interbreeding took place. That couldn't happen if Neanderthals weren't human.They aren't finding humans. Even if you found a live Neanderthal today, he wouldn't be human.
Some believe rape took place, but we were never friends.Yeah, he would. Humans are classed as genus HOMO. The earliest found (so far) is Homo habilis, who shows up nearly three million years ago. Through evolution, anatomically modern humans started showing up about 200k years ago and through continuing evolution became Homo sapiens about 50k years ago. There is evidence that H. sapiens encountered H. neanderthalensis repeatedly during the expansion eras, and the presence of Neanderthal genomes in H. sapiens indicates that interbreeding took place. That couldn't happen if Neanderthals weren't human.
As soon as they started sewing animal stomachs together to make bag pipes, and to carry water for hunting trip, away from the river, you are dealing with homosapiens.Yeah, he would. Humans are classed as genus HOMO. The earliest found (so far) is Homo habilis, who shows up nearly three million years ago. Through evolution, anatomically modern humans started showing up about 200k years ago and through continuing evolution became Homo sapiens about 50k years ago. There is evidence that H. sapiens encountered H. neanderthalensis repeatedly during the expansion eras, and the presence of Neanderthal genomes in H. sapiens indicates that interbreeding took place. That couldn't happen if Neanderthals weren't human.
I'm pretty sure Neanderthal's made water bottles out of animals they were culturally quite advance. That they didn't make bag pipes shows them to be more advancedAs soon as they started sewing animal stomachs together to make bag pipes, and to carry water for hunting trip, away from the river, you are dealing with homosapiens.