T
twinkletoes
Guest
I think John makes a good point: eclectic information went in, Kenpo came out. That doesn't necessarily make Kenpo eclectic. Its methods might be better described as varied or multiform.
Rainman,
I disagree with one word of your post only It is not alive in the literal sense, and it is not alive in the Thorntonian sense. I will agree that many train it alive, but I do not see this as an inherent quality of Kenpo, as it refers (in the thorntonian sense) to a training methodology that is outside of the curriculum itself. If you can clarify a different meaning of alive, I will accept it.
Robert,
I agree with OFK. Kenpo was radical during its early development, just as the JKD concept was too. Now it is conservative and (in many cases) traditional. (The true JKD idea might still be radical, in the few instances in which you can find it, but I'm digressing).
~TT
Rainman,
I disagree with one word of your post only It is not alive in the literal sense, and it is not alive in the Thorntonian sense. I will agree that many train it alive, but I do not see this as an inherent quality of Kenpo, as it refers (in the thorntonian sense) to a training methodology that is outside of the curriculum itself. If you can clarify a different meaning of alive, I will accept it.
Robert,
I agree with OFK. Kenpo was radical during its early development, just as the JKD concept was too. Now it is conservative and (in many cases) traditional. (The true JKD idea might still be radical, in the few instances in which you can find it, but I'm digressing).
~TT