I get your point, but lets face it - this problem is endemic to martial arts demonstrations across the board. These guys are actually less egregious than many I've seen. My "favorites" are the schools where the attacker comes in with a lunge punch that stops six inches short of the defenders face, then stands still with the punch fully extended while the defender executes a complex combination that ends with a throw that depends on grabbing the punch which has been left hanging out for several seconds.
I agree
Self defense should be judged against self defense not MMA. The KFM guys failed at MMA possibly because they brought their style to the game and failed to properly "train for the game." MMA isn't the bar to judge self defense but it is a great indicator for judging fighters. In fact I preach that one has to include training to beat MMA. So it is a force to be reckoned with.
As far as self defense goes. How does KFM compare to other self defense on the net?
The fact that the answer is that you have to dig around to find good self defense, is unfortunate.
IMO, from what i can see theyre trying to do something new regardless of if its verifiable. Theyre built on striking, so why wouldnt they be able to use their striking against other striking? It may not be made for MMA, but im not seeing any exercises being done to show them learning anything but striking with the questionable joint manipulations and grappling. But its mostly striking. So, in an arena of striking, why cant they use it? Im also not seeing anything to suggest RBSD. Its all striking and grappling. Like MMA, but not, and with 'new approaches'.
Lemme back that up:
Ive gone through Page 1 of the youtube search results now
Last edited by a moderator: