drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
- Messages
- 23,949
- Reaction score
- 8,692
bjj is moving towards that idea as well. Generally cross training in judo.
Do BETTER martial artists train ONE art or MANY arts?
- Thread starter Jenna
- Start date
bjj is moving towards that idea as well. Generally cross training in judo.
Shai Hulud
Purple Belt
Which is a terrific idea. Each plugs a gap in the other across the broad spectrum of techniques found in the art of grappling.
What do you choose in a fight? Kenpo Kicking or Tkd Kicking. If you choose TKD kicking, when were you planning on using kenpo?
The same way I choose any other technique in a fight. By deciding what is most likely to be the most effective under the specific circumstances at the time.
... and/or wrestling and/or sambo.
drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
- Messages
- 23,949
- Reaction score
- 8,692
And the interesting thing is that the cross training is geared not towards filling a gap in what you don't do. Striking,knife fighting,motorcycle racing. But to enhance what you do.
Shai Hulud
Purple Belt
"Motorcycle Racing" LOL
If your TKD kick worked, wouldn't you naturally follow with more TKD?
drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
- Messages
- 23,949
- Reaction score
- 8,692
If your TKD kick worked, wouldn't you naturally follow with more TKD?
Not necessarily you next kick could be different to keep the other guy off balance.
"Better" is kind of a fuzzy word here... Better by what criteria? If by better you mean a world champion Judo player, well you should probably stick to Judo. Champion Boxer? stick to boxing. Unless better means "well-rounded" and able to work in any situation (on the ground, striking, range of weapons, etc.) then you will probably be cross-training a fair bit. Or maybe better just means it has the strongest effect on your health and well being? Then maybe it changes as your body changes, maybe you start in wrestling as a kid and are doing Tai-Chi at 75 years old.
I think as long as you are still having fun, learning, improving and staying healthy you are on the right path and the rest doesn't really matter much. If it's just staying where you are to grind out another belt and not really getting anywhere it's time to switch things up.
I think as long as you are still having fun, learning, improving and staying healthy you are on the right path and the rest doesn't really matter much. If it's just staying where you are to grind out another belt and not really getting anywhere it's time to switch things up.
If your TKD kick worked, wouldn't you naturally follow with more TKD?
Have I ever given the impression that I think there is only one valid solution to any particular situation?
Sometimes a kick to the head is the best solution. Sometimes a twist to the wrist is.
Sent from an old fashioned 300 baud acoustic modem by whistling into the handset. Really.
OP
- Thread Starter
- #51
what would you yourself regard as a better / best kind of martial artist can I ask? Jx
I don't speak for all Kenpo, but kenpo is about limiting yourself to the ideas taught in the first twenty or thirty tech ideas, which means you should look like you are doing a technique, even if you aren't. So, my kenpo is a lot like Wing Chun, in that respect. Now, add TKD to that, and it becomes unlimited. That sounds like what you want; so, we both win!!!!!
For me, being well rounded and learning as much as possible, not seeing things as separate "styles", it's all martial arts, take the parts that fit with what you do from anywhere you can and make it your own. Regardless of how you define "art" in the sense of martial arts it's not about imitation only, but creativity. Whether it is for aesthetic value, or as a skill (like woodworking) it should not be about doing your best to do things like someone else. That's a good place to start, just as it is in painting and woodworking, but if you stop at imitation without making your own you'll never be "great".
Why would you think that? If your first technique was effective, then the situation has now changed. Your opponent may now be at a different distance, moving in a different direction, attempting a different tactic, and reacting differently. There may be other tactical factors which have changed as well. Use the technique which is most appropriate for the moment at hand, not the moment that is past.If your TKD kick worked, wouldn't you naturally follow with more TKD?
OP
- Thread Starter
- #55
I like that removal of the barriers idea that you suggest.. I wonder can well-rounded, learning as much as possible and making an art your own to be as you say "great".. can these things happen through the study of one art / style / school of thought or system exclusively do you think? Jx
Isn't there supposed to be a flow?
The normal flow will be kick -> punch -> clinch -> throw -> ground game.
toddfletcher
Yellow Belt
I'll throw this out there.
I understand and have discussed the flow of fighting countless times over the years. Often each stage of the 'flow' is assigned certain styles. However, I would pose the question, if one planned on having to move through this flow during a fight, does that mean one plans to fail at all stages until the end? I realize that is a safer bet, but I have seen incredible kickers who would put you down with incredible deftness. I spoke with some younger guys (20's) that talk about needing to focus on BJJ "since all fights eventually go to the ground". But then I see their kicks and strikes and they suck (and obvious lack of sufficient training).. so of course they fail and have to fall into a clinch/throw/ground path. NOTE: I hold no disrespect for BJJ or any ground styles. I am studying Judo ATM to improve my own - as the majority of my training has been TKD & Kenpo. However I hold to the fact that if I could use my kicks to their fullest, their would be blown out knees, broken ribs, and head trauma before I 'fell' into the later half of said flow.
I am curious if anyone agrees, and not and why. TIA.
I understand and have discussed the flow of fighting countless times over the years. Often each stage of the 'flow' is assigned certain styles. However, I would pose the question, if one planned on having to move through this flow during a fight, does that mean one plans to fail at all stages until the end? I realize that is a safer bet, but I have seen incredible kickers who would put you down with incredible deftness. I spoke with some younger guys (20's) that talk about needing to focus on BJJ "since all fights eventually go to the ground". But then I see their kicks and strikes and they suck (and obvious lack of sufficient training).. so of course they fail and have to fall into a clinch/throw/ground path. NOTE: I hold no disrespect for BJJ or any ground styles. I am studying Judo ATM to improve my own - as the majority of my training has been TKD & Kenpo. However I hold to the fact that if I could use my kicks to their fullest, their would be blown out knees, broken ribs, and head trauma before I 'fell' into the later half of said flow.
I am curious if anyone agrees, and not and why. TIA.
Danny T
Senior Master
That is not 'cross training' that is 'Returning to its Roots'.
I agree you can use TKD to avoid using Kenpo.
