Discovered ultimate MA !

A

Autocrat

Guest
Hi all.... recently out and about looking for training...... and a friend pointed out a small club, with the following advertised!

Do you want to learn selfdefence?
Do you want to know you can handle a situation?
Do you feel that you would be better able to do so knowing the following;

general punching, hand an arm strikes,
basic and advanced kicking techniques,
parry, block, evasion and absorbtion techniques,
grappling, locks, holds, chokes, throws,
Pressure point, vitals, alrms etc.
utilising weapons,
tackling and disarming armed opponents,
realistic combat techniques,
facing off and copmbating multiple opponents,
understanding the mental and emotional sides of confrontation and violence,

and all come in an easy to learn and practical system for teaching all of the above,





It's called karate!
LOL

Sorry, couldn't resist.... a friend dumped a load of books on me, thinks about systema, krav maga, or any other "wonder idea"..........

Most of these things are so similar it's unbelievable..... lookkk at the gracie jiujitsu spin.... if you combine judo and kickboxing, thats the result.... half the stances are straight from KB...... all these things take from their predecessors.... so whats all the fuss about!

So again, I apologise!
This is not an attack upon any style, system or school of combatt, training, MA or philosophy/way/do.... merely a giggle at the majority of people that fall for the hype and spin!
 
Yea so what is your point: This has been around for Centurys. Everybody want to reinvent the wheel.
 
Not necessarily reinventing, but pulling what they think works from certain systems and branding it their own.
 
Just like the weel, the human body for the most part the same every where you go.

there is a Style out there for everyone...but NEVER is there a style that can beat all styles.
 
terryl965 said:
Yea so what is your point: This has been around for Centurys. Everybody want to reinvent the wheel.
not to over simplify, but that constant look for what really works is called evolution.
 
Knifehand said:
not to over simplify, but that constant look for what really works is called evolution.
Evolution, not to simplified anything. the Martial Art have been around for century every decade there are new people saying I found the lost art of so and so, the truth is the lost art was never lost. The inner strenght was mis placed for a time and then refound by some instructor that made a visit to some far off place and found what has never been lost.
 
what i was getting at was that Martial Arts will eventually evolve. People put down people making their own styles, but that is exactly what happend when the shaolin monks created shaolin, they created their own style. then styles evolved to include weapons. People mix and match good ideas and eventually come up with a really good style. Not saying that there are styles that are really bad. But there may be some style one day that trumps others.

If you've seen Equilibrium, There was a MA called the GunKotta. As the name implies, its a MA with Guns. Obviously, the idea was nice, but it was impractical, but its a new idea.

If you stand still on a highway, you are likely to get run over, unless you start moving.
 
Knifehand said:
If you've seen Equilibrium, There was a MA called the GunKotta. As the name implies, its a MA with Guns. Obviously, the idea was nice, but it was impractical, but its a new idea.

I'm not sure what "gun Kata" (Gunkotta) is, but this made me chuckle.

We just implimented gun training as a stable of the TULISAN Tactical Training Instructors Gild, as firearms are a major component of the close quarter fray. And I'd say, it's ah, well....pretty practical... :uhyeah:
 
you have obviously never taken Brazilian Jiu jitsu because its absolutely nothing like combining kickboxing and judo.
 
These advertisements work because people are scared and want to try to have every base covered. Part of it is gullibility. Certain segments of the population see an ad touting a style purporting to include every style of combat (kicks, punches, blocking, takedowns, joint locks, throws etc.) and decide it MUST be the miracle style that does everything. Other people are simply scared. They want to be able to defend themselves, don't really know what to do, see these ads, and want to make sure they have all bases covered. The charlatans who put out these ads take full advantage of these people, knowing full well they don't know good from bad. Especially after 9/11, it is very easy to take advantage of people's paranoia about being victims and promise them ""The Ultimate Solution for Self Defense."
If you spread your energy over all these different aspects, how would you possibly be any good anyway? I'd be more afraid of someone who focused his energies into just a few techniques, but has mastered them.
 
I look at this as a straight up marketing technique. I think that there is a sense among some martial artists that the re-creation and/or re-organization of combative systems is a natural extension of their "ownership" of their movement. I think that there are positive AND negative aspects to this. Primarily, I am troubled by the lack of standardization. To elaborate, I feel that one of the important ingredients driving this trend is the lack of understanding among potential martial art students with regard to the differences between arts, as well as their inability to effectively judge the quality of instruction. The proliferation of new grandmasters, professors, masters, and newly reformatted arts has become a self - feeding machine, adding to the confusion and lack of standardization.

I don't personally find a problem with advanced practitioners realizing ownership of their movement, understanding the ways that they are unique, or organizing things so as to better understand themselves. I do, however, think that when they decide to go out and propagate "their way", they are making a rather pompous assumption. Who are you to suppose that I am not able to achieve the same level of understanding by studying the same way you have? If Mr. Professor new Grandmaster was able to achieve their level of martial excellence by following the path that they have, does the possibility not exist that I may too? Furthermore, I must conclude that the reformatting of other systems must necessarily involve the removal of concepts and techniques from their respective curriculae. I don't find that to be particularly wise. When you remove some pieces, the puzzle is never the same....

Finally, it seems to me that this is all rather unscientific. If Professor new Grandmaster really believes that they are that excellent and refined in their skills, then the logical deduction is that by following the path and training regime that they have, excellence and refinement may follow, with time. It does not follow that by practicing a different training regime that excellence and refinement will follow. That is illogical, and presumptive. If I were to travel a specific road and arrive at a particular destination, that doesn't mean I know any other way to get there. Were I to take you there one day, the most likely course would be the one I've travelled before....

That's what I figure anyhow.
 
oops... sem to have upset some... sorry, wasn't intentional... merely pointing out the humour of what I perceive as silly!

Saying that... time to respond!

... Knifehand ...
Sorry to disapoint, yet there are training regimes for gun users that are basically kata.... what was said in the film is actually true! There are strong tendencies for people to tak certain positions and perticular angles of fire that are more likely to be effective..... look at the training for the special forces, such as the SAS.... all their training points to common factors in such situations! It is real!

... jdam76 ...
Very sorry, but I said that from looking... but considering I spent Saturday traing with Royce, I will most definetly stand by my statement! The movement, the footwork, the shielding of the body so as to close with the opponent... definently KB or B.... the throws, takedowns, holds etc... same as Judo, ( or that family, inc. Jiu jitsu and aikido!).
Sorry if that offends.

... MichiganTKD ...
Not sure if I agree with that or not..... those that specialise in a few techniques and master them will be highly effective.... up to a point, then they will be lost against something new to them! Where as someone who has cross trained and picked up bits of everything has a better chance of low level survival in genereal..... both have pro's and con's!
I pressume the best method would be to learn a bit of everything, then specialise in a few techniques you prefer.... wouldn't you agree?

... Flatlander ...
Damned insightful post! Not sure about the ownership thing.... I assume thats just read differently than intended... I don't think anyone owns a technique.... but maybe that wasn't what was meant?
Still, everything else was about perfect! Brilliant analogy!


Still, though I meant this as a joke, I seriously belove there should be laws towards this sort of thing..... anyone, and I do mean anyone, can set up a club, a foundation, association etc..... you dfon't need to be trained or qualified etc. Furthermore, there are no truely independant bodies governing this at all.... I could set up a club and advertise it as the best form of self defence with innovative training methods, new techniques, secrets reveiled etc.... it's all bull!
Sod the hype! It should all be honest... I do my style because of what it is, not because of what is advertised! The amount of clubs I've visited, and then walked out of within 10 minutes because it was pants.... yet they have atleast 20 odd members paying 5 per hour minimum, who don't know anybetter, and could do alot better else where!

Does anybody else have these concerns, or is it just me?
 
there will always be ads like that, because the general public will never fully understand martial arts. There will always be people who believe that all they need is a few lessons and they will be able to fend off a gang of attackers like whoa.

It doesn't only apply to martial arts...its no different than the "lose 2 pounds a day" ads, or the "grow all your hair back in a day" ads. People want fast, amazing results, and many people are willing to buy into someone advertising that they can do it.
 
No disrespect but i don't understand how anyone can say that karate is a form of self defence. its a sport in my eyes they drop there hands to block kicks for gods sake. in a real life situation when your hand drops down to block an initial low punch or kick you have a sharp impliment in your neck or face i don't understand why any martial arts will do that is that not what your legs are also for apart from kicking and running away if you have the chance.
 
Not sure about the ownership thing.... I assume thats just read differently than intended... I don't think anyone owns a technique.... but maybe that wasn't what was meant?
Sorry about that. To clarify, by ownership what I mean is that one has a firm enough grasp of their technique that it becomes a part of their natural movement. It is no longer a "technique", but a response. Is that more clear, or have I refoggified?

Otherwise, thank you. :asian:
 
jjmcc said:
No disrespect but i don't understand how anyone can say that karate is a form of self defence. its a sport in my eyes they drop there hands to block kicks for gods sake. in a real life situation when your hand drops down to block an initial low punch or kick you have a sharp impliment in your neck or face i don't understand why any martial arts will do that is that not what your legs are also for apart from kicking and running away if you have the chance.
I have seen well trained karatekas move in ways that strongly discouraged me from wanting to test their limits. Might I reccommend you do a bit more research before you finalize your opinion on the matter?
 
Refoggified? :lol: Can I steal that?


Ditto on the Karateka thing. Go check out a Kyokushinkai Dojo and get back to us.:) Those guys are nuts! (in a good way)
 
Paul B said:
Refoggified? :lol: Can I steal that?


Ditto on the Karateka thing. Go check out a Kyokushinkai Dojo and get back to us.:) Those guys are nuts! (in a good way)
bump....
 
jjmcc said:
No disrespect but i don't understand how anyone can say that karate is a form of self defence. its a sport in my eyes they drop there hands to block kicks for gods sake. in a real life situation when your hand drops down to block an initial low punch or kick you have a sharp impliment in your neck or face i don't understand why any martial arts will do that is that not what your legs are also for apart from kicking and running away if you have the chance.

Im not sure where you're getting that from.Most Karate-ka are just as likely to block a kick with their knee as with their hands.And when they do block with their hands they usually still have one hand up to guard and have moved off the centre-line.Anyone who's ever had their foot caught by a Karate-ka will not dispute how vunerable you are when they catch you.
 
Back
Top