Here is an article that addresses an experiment conducted by Al Gore to prove Global warming is happening. The article claims that Gore doctored the experiment through the magic of video editing. I report, and then you decide. And if you decide wrong, I'll disagree with you...
http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/29/a...upposed-to-prove-his-global-warming-theories/
And for a different point of view on the global warming movement and the scandal called Climategate...
Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global
Warming Scam
http://www.amazon.com/Climategate-V...31/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&qid=1317516366&sr=8-11
From a readers review of the book:
http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/29/a...upposed-to-prove-his-global-warming-theories/
One of the video clips there, “Climate 101,” tells the story of how to do a “simple experiment” at home to prove carbon dioxide causes global warming. But if you watch closely, you’ll see an “inconvenient truth” of the worst kind. Watch the portion of the video that begins at 1:00 and ends at 1:20.
You see, he faked not only the experiment but also the results with video editing tricks. Video analysis proves this beyond a shadow of a doubt.
And for a different point of view on the global warming movement and the scandal called Climategate...
Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global
Warming Scam
http://www.amazon.com/Climategate-V...31/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&qid=1317516366&sr=8-11
By tracing the origins of the current climate scare, Sussman guides the
reader from the diabolical minds of Marx and Engels in the 1800s, to the global
governance machinations of the United Nations today. Climategate is a call to
action, warning Americans that their future is being undermined by a phony
pseudo-science aimed at altering every aspect of life in the United States and
the world.
From a readers review of the book:
What was so hard in my journey here as an engineer was to see that such a large
segment of the academic and scientific community has been corrupted into
religiously advancing this theory. The incentive system of having government
funding as the primary source where you get funding to advance the theory, but
sit out in the cold if you don't buy in is in itself rather disturbing. Sussman
didn't delve into this aspect, but it is partially covered in the book
"SuperFreakonomics". I have yet to see any author take on the challenge of how
to reform science funding. For the sake of the continued contribution of science
to human prosperity, this challenge must be taken up.
Last edited: