dancingalone
Grandmaster
Some instruction does take many years to acquire and even then not because of the years but if the student can take the time to pursue a deep enough level of training to actuate the skill. I realize that's not popular, but teaching for decades has shown me there are no short cuts.
Absolutely true. I can demonstrate certain things that most of my students simply can't duplicate because they have not refined their skills to the extent that I have. Regardless I still do it and somewhat frequently too. The reason is I want them to know what is possible and to aspire to reach it. I don't want to hide it away as 'advanced' material.
I actually do teach formal bunkai as my teacher did to me. The formal bunkai are gateway illustrations. To the uninitiated they can appear impressive and innovative, so it's useful to show them as a teaching tool. At the same time, we stress of course that kata applications are only limited by one's imagination and one's physical skill. Knowing a few examples given to you by your instructor should not limit a dedicated student from devising 'new' ones for themselves.In the issue of not naming your art, we live in a time where too many names are grabbed for everything and naming restricts potential. if you buy a kata movement as a bunkai for beginning, intermediate and advanced students you've locked it down to 3 applications. But any movement may have dozens of application potentials to drop an opponent, and by naming the 3, you leave out the 50.
About once or twice a year during our internal seminars, I challenge all my students to demonstrate an application to a certain movement. I'm exceedingly pleased every time I am shown something I know I did not teach them myself, and this happens frequently enough that I know I am not rooting my students in dogma.
Last edited: