JeffJ said:True, it can take a very high level of technical proficiency, but have your really created anything by doing that? Have you pushed the boundaries of your medium by copying what has already been done? As far as combatives are concerned, hasn't it already been done many times over?
It may not be original, but it's still art. Kids in school are shown these things as example - for some students it becomes a goal to look forward to. Of course in the beginning they immitate these styles to understand it. Then they start using these styles to create their own pieces of art.
In a combative sense you have your punches, kicks, throws and holds with different names but share the same principles. But even if two students may train in the same styles the results will be different. In essence the martial artist uses these moves to define themselves in their art.
I agree that it's been done many many times over. But I still remember a time when there was only Karate, Judo and TKD. Then other martial arts became exposed as popularity soared. Now we have things like MMAs and military type combat system which evolved from moves borrowed from different styles. So I see a sort of evolution that is pulling away from traditional term martial art into a combat system.
Banking off my master's perspective the reason a martial art was created is to preserve their culture and way of life. Like how the Samurai wanted to hold onto their budo so they gave up their swords and created Aikido. Same reason why my master has dedicated his entire life promoting Thai culture through Muay Thai. Many martial arts were created to teach future generations about their culture and why a combat system was used in the past.
I say a punch is a punch, a kick is a kick, a throw is a throw and a hold is a hold no matter what pretty name you call it. But if you have people there to appreciate it, those people will call it art.