Chinese Historical Philosophy:

A great way to understand China is to Philosophy and religions.

Pretty much that means Confucius (and the variations), Taoist (and the variations) and Chan Buddhism, but there are other players that should be look at as well, Moists (not Mao and not of 3 stooges fame either) Legalists, etc.
 
The influence of Confucius and Daoism cannot be understated in Chinese philosophy and religion. Apart from the Legalist movement, most philosophies have used Confucianism or Daoism as a base, and in many cases both. Even Chan Buddhism, originally Dhyana, mixed with Daoist philosophy.

It is surprising how similar Confucian and Daoist philosophy is given how different their starting positions were.
 
Can someone please explain to me the philosophy of yin and yang as it relates to Taoism? I understand that yin and yang are opposites and with out one the other can not exist but how does this relate to Taoism? Any help would be appreciated.
 
...
I understand that yin and yang are opposites and with out one the other can not exist
...

It's a common misunderstanding that yin and yang are "opposites". The better word to describe them is "complementary".

As for how it relates to Taoism... the whole philosophy is all about yin and yang and the interplay between the two. Well... unless you get into what some people call "religious" Taoism (the one you make offerings of food and incense to a pantheon of immortals).
 
The influence of Confucius and Daoism cannot be understated in Chinese philosophy and religion. Apart from the Legalist movement, most philosophies have used Confucianism or Daoism as a base, and in many cases both. Even Chan Buddhism, originally Dhyana, mixed with Daoist philosophy.

I like this. This perhaps can get the rust out of my philosophical gears. The Legge translation of the Rujia is my prized possession in my philosophical texts.

Confucianism in itself has a base in the Ancestral worship of ancient China, but Daoism is a bit of a struggle for me. Not in understanding (or lack thereof) but rather in how much I agree (or disagree) with various works.
 
Understanding Taoism and Confucius Maoist and Chan are important schools in understanding Chinese philosophy. Also Folk religion and the different sects help as well. The site gives a good basic outline but understanding the religious and historical fact will also help in getting a clearer picture of thought.
 
Well, lets cut with this superficial chit chat, and get down to something!

What shall it be? Buddhism, Daoism, or Confucianism?
 
Okay, from my perspective the most influential of the major philosophies of China (and East Asia in general) is found in the Analects, Mengzi's works, and the Doctrine of the Mean.

I would like to initiate a conversation on "Li" or "ritual propriety" as in my opinion, this ideal touches everything else that is philosophical or metaphysical in China...
Any takers?
 
Returning to a few posts back for a moment:
First there was Wuji which separated into Yin and Yang
Yin and Yang joined to make Taiji (not the martial art but opposites)

I think that it goes from wuji to taiji to yin and yang. The reasoning behind this is that taiji represents the constant interplay between yin & yang -- they haven't separated yet, and do not yet exist as separate concepts or entities that can exist on their own, even temporarily.

In other words, consider each of these (the following) existing as a state at a given moment. Each state describes fewer things than the previous state, eventually leading to a description of one of "the myriad things" (the numerals indicate levels of distinction):

1- wuji state (everything, no distinctions)
2- taiji state (everything, distinctions visible, but always changing, but still conceptualized as "everything" -- the seed of division is planted here)
3- yin only state
3- yang only state
4- yin/yin state (two bars, both broken)
4- yin/yang state
4- yang/yang state
4- yang/yin state
5- kun trigram
5- gen trigram
5+- and so on, through hexagrams, etc.

As for the pre-trigram two-bar states (e.g. yin/yin), I found those described in a book which is not with me right now, but it makes sense to me conceptually. Of course, it's all just a model. :)
 
There is 3 Yin and 3 Yang. Older(ancient),Lesser and greater.This has its realtionship in as Mograph stated and breaks down into the Bagua. It also IMO has realtion to the channels in the body.
In its realtion to the channels of the body:

3 channels for arm 3 channels for leg
1.Yang brightness
2.Greater Yang
3.Lesser Yang

3 channels for arm 3 channels for leg
1.Absolute Yin
2.Greater Yin
3.Lesser Yin
 
Returning to a few posts back for a moment:


I think that it goes from wuji to taiji to yin and yang. The reasoning behind this is that taiji represents the constant interplay between yin & yang -- they haven't separated yet, and do not yet exist as separate concepts or entities that can exist on their own, even temporarily.

In other words, consider each of these (the following) existing as a state at a given moment. Each state describes fewer things than the previous state, eventually leading to a description of one of "the myriad things" (the numerals indicate levels of distinction):

1- wuji state (everything, no distinctions)
2- taiji state (everything, distinctions visible, but always changing, but still conceptualized as "everything" -- the seed of division is planted here)
3- yin only state
3- yang only state
4- yin/yin state (two bars, both broken)
4- yin/yang state
4- yang/yang state
4- yang/yin state
5- kun trigram
5- gen trigram
5+- and so on, through hexagrams, etc.

As for the pre-trigram two-bar states (e.g. yin/yin), I found those described in a book which is not with me right now, but it makes sense to me conceptually. Of course, it's all just a model. :)

Actually from Taoist theory wuji though movement separated onto Yin and yang from this you get taiji and it is this taiji that separate into its Yin yang aspects and from this you wu xing

http://www.triplexunity.com/docs/background1_files/image012.gif

image012.gif


Wang, Zong-Yue said: “What is Taiji? It is generated from Wuji, and is a pivotal function of movement and stillness. It is the mother of Yin and Yang. When it moves it divides. At rest it reunites.” From this, it is known that Taiji is not Wuji, and is also not Yin and Yang. Instead an inclination of the natural pivotal function which makes the Wuji derive into Yin and Yang also makes the Yin and Yang reunite into the state of Wuji. This natural pivotal function of movement and stillness is called the ‘Dao’ or the ‘rule’ of great nature.

There is also a great diagram here
 
In a way both Xue and Mograph are correct.

Everything starts from Wuji and the movement in Wuji is Yang in Huang Ji
the stillness is Yin in Huang Ji.

From Huang Ji(Highest Emperor?) the same stillness and movement generate Tai Ji. Tai Ji has its movement and stillness generating Ancient Yin and Ancient Yang which birth Greater Yin and Greater Yang which birth Lesser Yin and Lesser Yang which birth Heaven and Earth Trigram and on to the other Trigrams. But if we look at Later Heaven Bagua we see Fire and Water replace Heaven and Earth's position. I guess it is possible that because of Tsou Yen Wu Xing theory Taoist some how fitted the Five element theory in. Looking at the diagram we see Fire is the first element created in the Wu Xing. We also see Water giving life to all things.

Also the importance of Fire and Water,Wu Xing may have come about because of the Alchemist followers of Tsou Yen.

Where the Fu Hsi Bagua did not have those elements in yet.
 
Could it be said that we are looking at descriptions of forces and energies, not things?

For example, we are not looking at Yang things which eventually divide up into the myriad things, but Yang energy which divides into myriad energies? Where an energy is a direction, a force, a movement, a feeling? So Wuji would be all forces and energies, and taiji would be forces having one dominant characteristic combined with forces having the opposite dominant characteristic with those forces constantly changing direction?

Or could yin/yang represent positively and negatively charged particles, which eventually combine to create atoms, molecules, and then matter?

Just ponderin'.
 
Could it be said that we are looking at descriptions of forces and energies, not things?

For example, we are not looking at Yang things which eventually divide up into the myriad things, but Yang energy which divides into myriad energies? Where an energy is a direction, a force, a movement, a feeling? So Wuji would be all forces and energies, and taiji would be forces having one dominant characteristic combined with forces having the opposite dominant characteristic with those forces constantly changing direction?

Or could yin/yang represent positively and negatively charged particles, which eventually combine to create atoms, molecules, and then matter?

Yes we are looking at forces of energy. E=MC2 comes to mind of energy turning into form. Looking at Wuji we find emptiness then in turns produces the formula of E=MC2.

The character used from Wu Xing(five elements) in Xue Sheng's diagram to produce the Ten thousand things is Sui(Shui) water.

Water does have Yin and Yang. I can only speculate that the Yang energy of the water element produces life because Yang is a moving type of energy.

It's much simplier when the Chinese just said Nuwa or other creator deity.

Speaking of creator deity when we look thru the time periods we find the creation deity changes. And it can get confusing and at times contradicting.
 
If energy is neither created nor destroyed, then could it be argued that the yin or yang nature of energy depends on perspective? One moves to Yin, the other moves to Yang, while the whole remains constant?
 
If energy is neither created nor destroyed, then could it be argued that the yin or yang nature of energy depends on perspective? One moves to Yin, the other moves to Yang, while the whole remains constant?

Could be, could Yin and Yang then also be equated to positive and negative charges.
 
Could there be yin without yang? Could there be day without night? Evil without good?
 
Back
Top