Corporal Hicks
Black Belt
Heres an interesting statement:
"I can have no partner, nor do I need one, for a partner takes away the fire for the fight. I've no need for sensual or sexual activity it only makes me weaker internally"
I picked this statement out of a recent newspaper about some up and coming boxer and some statement he had made, its not the exact words but its something like that, seeing I've just lost the damn paper and now cant put the exact quotes.
But it made me think, for both guys and gals here, what are your views? Do you think that having a partner could make your internally weaker and weaken your appetite for training?
What about being sensual and sexual? Do you think because you are being soft and are involved in those sort of activities (I'm watching my step here lol) that you are losing something and cannot be rated as a "hard man".
What about the statement in itself? Can you be a lover and a fighter? Or will you be a better fighter if your not a lover or vice versa?
Regards
"I can have no partner, nor do I need one, for a partner takes away the fire for the fight. I've no need for sensual or sexual activity it only makes me weaker internally"
I picked this statement out of a recent newspaper about some up and coming boxer and some statement he had made, its not the exact words but its something like that, seeing I've just lost the damn paper and now cant put the exact quotes.
But it made me think, for both guys and gals here, what are your views? Do you think that having a partner could make your internally weaker and weaken your appetite for training?
What about being sensual and sexual? Do you think because you are being soft and are involved in those sort of activities (I'm watching my step here lol) that you are losing something and cannot be rated as a "hard man".
What about the statement in itself? Can you be a lover and a fighter? Or will you be a better fighter if your not a lover or vice versa?
Regards