Hi Alex,
The following is said dispassionately, so please try to take it in that vein… what I'm intending here is to highlight a few things to you, to help you in your communication here, as well as highlighting one or two home truths...
As a trained Wing Chun practitioner I know of the myths surrounding Bruce Lee,
Okay, to clarify this, you aren't quite what many here would class as a "trained Wing Chun practitioner"… not yet, at least. At present, with two years experience, you're still very much new to this… you have some understanding of the system, sure, but I'm not sure that that little amount of time can class you as being particularly informed in this area. As for the stories around Bruce, you're 17, yeah? It might help to remember that there are members here who have trained with students and contemporaries of Bruce, if not Bruce himself… and certainly from around, or even before the time that Bruce was around.
This isn't to discredit you, but to demonstrate that you might be overreaching your knowledge in this case.
still even on his BEST DAY FIGHTING they say he still couldn't beat Ip Man or Wong Shun Leung,
As was asked, who is it that says anything like that? I haven't ever even come across anyone discussing this, let alone claiming who would win in any circumstances. I have come across certain Wing Chun practitioners downplay Bruce's experience and knowledge of Wing Chun… but that's quite a different thing entirely.
but whats a student without a master,
That depends on who the student is, and how far they went with their instructor in the first place, yeah? Of course, I'm not sure where the context for this comment is…
he was one of the hardest training men IN HISTORY.
Nor this… of course, the Spartan's might have disagreed… as would many, many others throughout history. Bruce might be one of the most well known from recent history in terms of his training methodology, but that's far from the same thing as saying that he was one of the hardest training persons in history…
My point is that overly dramatic rhetoric can lead you to claim some things that are very hard to support, or are outright incorrect. A more balanced look at things can be far more in line with reality, as well as being less likely to appear overly eager to push a single bias.
I respect the legend with highest possible honors in my book.
Okay. Of course, the legend and the man aren't necessarily the same thing…
I and my friend don are 2 training machines who constantly train and always aim high with training.
Hmm. Okay… to be frank, I get that you might think this, but I don't know that it would stack up against what others do… nor do I see any real relevance at all. I get that you're proud of your ethic and training mentality, which is great… but this comment has no bearing on the rest of your post, this thread, or anything similar, and has no support at all other than your (personal) impression.
Don't worry about impressing anyone here… it's really not necessary. Not only that, but talking about how intense your training is tends not to impress anyway… you'd be better served simply engaging in conversation, and talking about things from your level of experience.
All the best with the rest of your time on the forum here, and I look forward to seeing you around.