Flying Crane
Sr. Grandmaster
Which is why I am trying to give his comments some context and clarity based on what I understand he has, and has not, trained. Because it matters, and he isnāt in a position to comment on something with which he has no experience.He comments on today's Shaolin, not mentioning traditional or modern.
I donāt know the answer to that question because I havenāt trained in other schools to be able to comment on what they do or do not do. And apparently neither has Ranton.Do you disagree with Ranton's message "Effectiveness ... the overwhelming amount of Shaolin Kung Fu classes do not include sparring, do not include chin na, do not include shuai jiaoāremoving all of the parts that make an effective martial art?"
Rantonās experience or lack thereof is directly important here. Ranton does not know how the majority of kung fu schools trained. He hasnāt trained with them. How could he know? He only knows modern wushu, which specifically and deliberately excludes those things. He is correct in that schools teaching modern wushu are unlikely to include those things. But he isnāt qualified to comment outside of modern wushu, and his comments need to be understood to be only valid with regards to modern wushu.Ranton's Shaolin training or knowledge does not affect the answer. To argue "There is not an overwhelming amount of Shaolin Kung Fu classes that do not include sparring ... because Ranton has not trained traditional Shaolin" is an error in reasoning.
Let me ask you this: let us suppose that someone states that he has been eating Fruit Loops for the past eight years and he has come to the conclusion that, as much as he loves Fruit Loops because they are delicious, he must face the truth that breakfast cereals have zero nutritional value. Would you accept this statement? Would you recognize that there are many other types of breakfast cereals, many of which have at least some nutritional value? So his comments need context and need to be limited to what he has experience with.
Renton has trained in the Fruit Loops of kung fu. He does not know what other kung fu is like, nor how it is trained.
In the spirit of that comment, a valid point would be simply to say that Modern wushu is unlikely to give one effective combat skills. The problem is, Ranton simply calls it Shaolin, implying all Shaolin martial arts, which modern wushu is not. It is misleading. I am simply trying to clear up that misleading information.An implied suggestion from Ranton's video that may be meaningful to the OP (the reason it was posted) is to ask prospective MA schools if they teach fighting principles, concepts and techniques that can be applied in sparring.
Last edited: