Because basing things on merit and ability would be stupid

Big Don

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
10,551
Reaction score
190
Location
Sanger CA
California Asks Judges: Gay or Straight?

Daniel Halper

The Weekly Standard EXCERPT
February 24, 2012 10:36 AM

In order to make sure gays and lesbians are adequately represented on the judicial bench, the state of California is requiring all judges and justices to reveal their sexual orientation. The announcement was made in an internal memo sent to all California judges and justices.
“[The Administrative Office of the Courts] is contacting all judges and justices to gather data on race/ethnicity, gender identification, and sexual orientation,” reads an email sent by Romunda Price of the Administrative Office of the Courts. A copy of Price’s memo was obtained by THE WEEKLY STANDARD.
“Providing complete and accurate aggregate demographic data is crucial to garnering continuing legislative support for securing critically needed judgeships,” Price writes.
The process of self-revealing one’s sexual orientation is an element of a now yearly process. “To ensure that the AOC reports accurate data and to avoid the need to ask all judges to provide this information on an annual basis, the questionnaire asks that names be provided. The AOC, however, will release only aggregate statistical information, by jurisdiction, as required by the Government Code and will not identify any specific justice or judge.”
Philip R. Carrizosa of the executive office of communications at the Judicial Council of California, the Administrative Office of the Courts, confirmed the authenticity of Price’s email regarding gender identification and sexual orientation to THE WEEKLY STANDARD.
End excerpt
Diversity is nice, but, it is NOT important. It is PURELY and SINGULARLY cosmetic. So much for judging people by the content of their character...
 
Last edited:
something tells me there is probably more to the story than what is being revealed here. Probably some key element that is being deliberately hidden, to make it appear something that it is not.
 
You mean ... say ... the probability that most of those people were bought off by the LDS church to pass Prop 8 to continue LBGQTA discrimination? The notion that tit for tat is only appropriate when it serves one's own agenda? Diversity is important if all but your own class/race/preference are hung out to dry so you can buy that yacht.

Just sayin' ....
 
Isn't this how it always ends up with government good intentions. From acceptance to enforcement to fines and penalties for non-compliance with the laws made to "help" people. It used to be a bad thing to force people "out of the closet," now it is government policy.
 
While I disapprove of the tactic, I *understand why* it is being sought.
 
Hmmm...I'm confused. Isn't it the democrats who always say the republicans want to get into everybodies bedrooms? I would hear people say, "George Bush spends too much money." I would always say, if you think he spends too much, wait till you get another democrat in office. The same applies here. If you are afraid of republicans getting into your bedroom business, wait till the democrats start opening that door. You can see that coming true in this thread. Not only do they want to get into your bedroom, you are going to have to sign paperwork to confirm your sexual orientation to get a job.

Are these judges required to state their status, and if they refuse, what is the result?
 
So... if they feel a segment is underrepresented, qualified Judges will be passed over based on their sexual orientation? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

People. Are. ****ing. Stupid.
 
The idea that you can`t serve a specific subgroup in your local population unless you`re one of them seems pretty foolish. How many male OB-GYNs do we have?
 
Here is the next step...

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/...bout-sexual-orientation-on-application-forms/

California’s state colleges and universities are laying plans to ask students about their sexual orientation next year on application or enrollment forms, becoming the largest group of schools in the country to do so. The move has raised the hopes of gay activists for recognition but the concerns of others about privacy.
The questions, which students could answer voluntarily, would be posed because of a little-known state law aimed at gauging the size of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) populations on the campuses. The law encourages UC, Cal State and community colleges to explore whether they are offering enough services, such as counseling, for those students.
“It would be useful to know if we are underserving the population,” said Jesse Bernal, the UC system’s interim diversity coordinator. In addition, giving students the opportunity to answer such questions, he added, “sends a positive message of inclusiveness to LGBT students and creates an environment that is inclusive and welcoming of diverse populations.”



Like seat belt laws, it always begins as a nice gesture that is completely voluntary. Then, once it is on the books, it becomes mandatory, with fines, penalties and jail time to follow...
 
Back
Top