What do you think? Is RFID worth the convenience or is it setting up some dangerous privacy-invasion precedents?Be Afraid: Powder-Sized RFID Chips
Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:58AM EST
http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/samiljan/4515/be-afraid-powder-sized-rfid-chips
Everyone's so paranoid about the RFID chips that are already in place in so many parts of our lives, so here's an item (via Engadget and Pink Tentacle) about Hitachi's new powder-sized RFID chips to make us even more scared of Big Brother (or little-Brother-ID thief). RFID chips are tiny microchips that use radio waves to do everything from conduct credit card transactions (as on those little key-fob-Paypass MasterCard thingies) and pay for tolls (EZ Pass and its ilk) to keeping track of your devices and travel (U.S. passports).
Hitachi plans to start marketing these new chipsseriously no bigger than a speck of dust at 0.05 x 0.05 mmin two to three years. The company says this super-tiny chip can be used in paper, currency, gift certificates, and the like, but as some sites have pointed out, today's chips are already small enough for those uses. So, as Engadget cracked, does this mean we should be watching what we eat in case of some James-Bond-style pepper-shaker swap?
Maybe, but is the terror around RFID over-hyped? According to most proponents of the technology, and my own experiences paying with PayPass at my local drug store, you really need to physically tap the RFID chip to something for the transaction to go through. And yet, when I go through a toll booth, my RFID-enabled EZ Pass box is only about ten feet away from the sensor. So maybe it is time to watch what you eat, lest Big Brother starts to track you wirelessly (or you spill some RFID powder from which evil ID thieves can extract your vital stats!)
For me if I were a criminal (murderer/molster/rapist type) then yeah I can understand having one of those things implanted or placed upon me so that they'd know where I'm at. Hell, I'd deserve it.
But as a non-violent (except when someone ****s with me) everyday average citizen... then no, nobody needs know where I'm at if I don't want 'em to know. I mean I thought that's (part of) what made this country great... the freedom to go to and from without any questions or hassels comrade.
As for tracking lost children then that's an sticky. Maybe the child could wear one until they're of age and then have it voluntarily removed. Or as in the case of some people who have senile parents that habitually wander off then again I give a reluctant ...oh-kay.
The article does state that at present everything involving the device(s) has to be voluntary... but eventually it may not always be thus. If they're that tiny they could be placed inconspicuously on clothing or even skin and volia your alibi's had better stick buddy.
One use I think they could use it for (as if), is to find terrorists by secretly implanting the ones in custody and then letting them go... if we're lucky they'll go running back to Osama or some other big-wig baddie.