Phoenix44
Master of Arts
This is an interesting question, and I think the answer is relative. Let's suppose for argument's sake that half your salary should be spent on rent/mortgage--I've heard that figure quoted. In this part of the country, the average monthly mortgage payment is $2,200 (2002 figures). That would mean to fit this scenario, the relative salary would be $52,800. But average per capita income is only $49,500. You MAY be able to live here, but with gasoline prices at $2.59/gallon, and utility rates the highest in the country, even with a lower rent or mortgage, you're going to hurt.Some one please define a living wage in a dollar rate. Every time i hear the term its this group is not making a living wage, so what is it $8/hr, $9, $10, ...
Now at $8/hr, 40 hr weeks, 52 weeks/year, you'd earn less than $17,000. Well, even with TWO incomes in the household, that's not a living wage in this part of the country.
The problem is that at the national minimum wage, $5.15/hr, you can't afford to live ANYWHERE in the United States of America. So $5.15/hr is not a living wage in this country.
I agree that any worker is worth whatever someone is willing to pay him/her, but I really have to wonder why someone MUST earn $10 million/year while paying the workers $5.15/hr.