sgtmac_46
Senior Master
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 4,753
- Reaction score
- 189
I strongly believe you're correct on the hierarchical respect point.......look at any hierarchical gathering of young males who are prone to violence......from high school to prison.......taking something relatively insignificant away from someone else, like their cigarettes or their chocolate pudding or their lunch money.......is an act of social dominance, it's a way of asserting dominance and control over another male......it's done in front of others, and the male the item is taken from either submits, and loses status, while the person doing the taking gains status......or he has to fight to keep whatever he takes. And since they pick their marks carefully, they know the likelihood of their target fighting back is low.I don't think you can necessarily discount that in this case. Look at it from their perspective, you have the reward (the smokes), what is the risk? Three guys, one of whom is armed, against a lone individual...probably not much risk from their perspective.
There's also the chance that this could have been more of a hierarchical thing where they felt the need to impose their will because he refused their demand (the whole "respect" thing).
It's also why, in some settings, one can't simply write it off as 'Oh well, i'm not fighting someone over a pudding pop'......as there's far more at stake than a pudding pop.......in prison one has to be willing to KILL to keep their 'pudding pop', or any such small transgression of male dominance......because once the label of 'MARK' is attached to you, life has just gotten INFINITELY WORSE!