heretic888
Senior Master
Chicago Tribune said:It is important to many creationists that man and dinosaur lived simultaneously because they believe there was no death in the world until Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden. If the Genesis story is false, they say, then there would be no need for Jesus Christ to redeem the sins of the world.
Um, can you say allegory?? Geez.
I mean, fer crissakes, the philosophical notion that we are living in a "fallen" or "descended" state is hardly a novelty of Christianity. This is essentially the same understanding in the Buddhist samsara and the Hindu maya, among others. Even Christianity by and large derives its "fallen" terminology and metaphysics from the writings of Plato (who famously proclaimed the body to be a "tomb of the soul" and formulated the Allegory of the Cave).
Yet, none of these philosophies has to resort to non-historical fantasies and mythologies to support its philosophical framework. Christianity (or, at least certain varieties of it) is unique in this regard.
Chicago Tribune said:Thus, at the Museum of Earth History, Genesis dictates gentle, vegetarian dinosaurs sharing Eden with Adam and Eve [...]
I'm suddenly reminded of the comments of The Daily Show's Lewis Black (and I'm paraphrasing here)...
Yes, because those rows of eighty 7-inch daggers in their mouths would have been of enormous help in hunting down and killing the most elusive prey of them all: plants!
Chicago Tribune said:"Another exhibit confirms that dinosaurs, like all land creatures created on Day 6, were on Noah's Ark. The exhibit maintains that the ark could accommodate them because it was huge--450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high--and only smaller, adolescent dinosaurs were put on board.
Is there actually any Biblical reference to dinosaurs in Noah's ark?? And, if so, is there any reference to them only being adolescents??
I mean, it just amazes me the elaborate qualifiers and justifications these guys cook up to make their mythological fantasies "fit in" with real life...
Chicago Tribune said:"Such literal interpretation is essential, Sharp said, because "if we lose Genesis as a legitimate scientific and historical explanation for man, then we lose the validity of Christianity. Period."
Yes, because apparently, Roman Catholicism and orthodox Judaism (both of whom do not regard Genesis as a literal account of history) have their own traditions dead wrong.
Creationist Guy said:I'm glad I haven't eaten anything yet today because I feel like throwing up.
Personally, I find it all more amusing than I do upsetting.
Laterz.