Alarm bells

theletch1

Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
8,073
Reaction score
170
Location
79 Wistful Vista
A friend of mine (female and SMALL) recently called me to see what I thought of a new ninjutsu school in the area. I told her I hadn't heard of the guy and that she should meet with him and watch a class if she were truly interested. Here's her report. She entered the dojo and all movement stopped. It was almost like the old west movies where the guy walks into the bar and everyone freezes and the piano stops playing. There were no other females present. After talking with the instructor and getting a class schedule and fee schedule (I'll get to that) she was told by the instructor the he "couldn't allow her to train in the dojo" since she, being a woman, was sure to get hurt training at his school. So much for teaching control to your students I guess. Now, the schedule was 2 30 min classes per week. The fee was $70.00 per month, 1 yr contract and the kicker.... you don't pay the instructor directly, you give him your banking info and he pulls it directly from your account. So, anyone else have alarm bells going off?
 
Fire Departments don't have that many bells....

Wow. That's a lawsuit waiting to happen. If nothing else, a friendly note to the better business bureau in the vicinity.
 
Definate warning signs here....

My instructors one of my best friends...and I wouldn't give him my banking info.
Definately wouldn't give a stranger.
 
Kaith Rustaz said:
Definate warning signs here....

My instructors one of my best friends...and I wouldn't give him my banking info.
Definately wouldn't give a stranger.
I agree with this.
 
Have it your way at McDojo's...Would you like a punch with that?
 
I sometimes give certain banking information to ppl to facilitate preauthorized payments and stuff. Say, a voided cheque will often do the trick. But not to a MA school that obviously sucks mud.
 
Tell her to run.

Very fast, very far from that dojo.

Apart from the control issues and the funky bank debiting process, the cost is absurd. I live in a very high cost-of-living city, with correspondingly high rent to pay on space, etc. I've trained in the Bujinkan for twenty years and am at "nosebleed" rank level, up where the air is thin. :wink2: My classes run an hour and a half to two hours twice a week, and I charge $65 a month for beginners. On one's first promotion from white belt it drops to $55 until first-degree black belt, when it drops to $35.

I hope this is not a Bujinkan dojo your friend checked out; but if it is I'd like to know about it, as I'll be in Japan again in a couple of weeks.
 
Oh, I'm pretty sure theletch was asking "tongue in cheek" and knows perfectly well that that place is ridiculous.
 
theletch1 said:
A friend of mine (female and SMALL) recently called me to see what I thought of a new ninjutsu school in the area. I told her I hadn't heard of the guy and that she should meet with him and watch a class if she were truly interested. Here's her report. She entered the dojo and all movement stopped. It was almost like the old west movies where the guy walks into the bar and everyone freezes and the piano stops playing. There were no other females present. After talking with the instructor and getting a class schedule and fee schedule (I'll get to that) she was told by the instructor the he "couldn't allow her to train in the dojo" since she, being a woman, was sure to get hurt training at his school. So much for teaching control to your students I guess. Now, the schedule was 2 30 min classes per week. The fee was $70.00 per month, 1 yr contract and the kicker.... you don't pay the instructor directly, you give him your banking info and he pulls it directly from your account. So, anyone else have alarm bells going off?
I used to work at a school that followed that exact game plan save for the "no females" thing. I have no alarm bells going off however. The idea of not letting females train sounds like a great reason to file a descrimination lawsuit. I think the benefit would be to make the males that join really feel like they are learning something special. It reminds me a lot of people who refuse to teach children. All it says to me is that they haven't prioritized basics from specialized moves. As for the billing situation, I feel it will help that school survive where others fall to the wayside. However, it can backfire on them if they get too greedy. Look at it like this 70 dollars per month for a year is less than $1000 dollars. You have the option of paying up front or taking it out of your account. The beauty of it all is that the Ninja dude is in charge of teaching people to kill, and a seperate entity is the guy taking your money. Mr. Ninja never looks like the bad guy. Billing issues and lawsuits are handled by some faceless beurocrats in florida or someplace. It seperates the dabblers from those whom are willing to buy a year of karate in one lump sum(with the option of twelve separate and easy payments of course). Selling lessons in blocks isn't the end of the world you know.
Sean
 
Dale Seago said:
Tell her to run.

Very fast, very far from that dojo.

Apart from the control issues and the funky bank debiting process, the cost is absurd. I live in a very high cost-of-living city, with correspondingly high rent to pay on space, etc. I've trained in the Bujinkan for twenty years and am at "nosebleed" rank level, up where the air is thin. :wink2: My classes run an hour and a half to two hours twice a week, and I charge $65 a month for beginners. On one's first promotion from white belt it drops to $55 until first-degree black belt, when it drops to $35.

I hope this is not a Bujinkan dojo your friend checked out; but if it is I'd like to know about it, as I'll be in Japan again in a couple of weeks.
I'm going to give you some free advice. The schools that charge the most for some reason or another are the most sucsessfull. I don't know why but wealthy people don't want budget lessons. They want to feel like they are getting the best. Charge $75 to start and see if enrolment drops. I think you will be suprised.
Sean
 
Seig said:
It also sounds like sexual discrimination, a complaint could shut them down.
You know Seig, its kind of ironic that this puts a woman in a position to fight to be on a one year contract. I'm sure if she pushes hard enough, they will take her money. %-}
Sean
 
2 30 minute classes a week? DING DING DING!!!

Banking info? Well, that depends. Is it where you give them a check, and they do an automatic withdrawal? That's primarily how my school does it, but if you object to the automatic withdrawal, you can either: A. Have them print up a book of checks that they give to you, similar to car loans, or B. pay for a year in advance at a 20% discounted rate.
Now, if the other school wants your whole account info, then there's a problem.
 
It reminds me a lot of people who refuse to teach children. All it says to me is that they haven't prioritized basics from specialized moves.

I disagree with this statement. Not teaching children isn't a matter of prioritization. IMO, a child doesn't have the fine motor control of an adult to do some of the advanced techniques (which is why I also disagree with an 8yr old Black Belt/Sash in anything). Also, Children do not have the mental reasoning yet to distinguish the level of force needed in an encounter.

You can't lump all instructors into one statement like that. I'm sure there are some that would qualify under that, but not all...
 
OUMoose said:
I disagree with this statement. Not teaching children isn't a matter of prioritization. IMO, a child doesn't have the fine motor control of an adult to do some of the advanced techniques (which is why I also disagree with an 8yr old Black Belt/Sash in anything). Also, Children do not have the mental reasoning yet to distinguish the level of force needed in an encounter.

You can't lump all instructors into one statement like that. I'm sure there are some that would qualify under that, but not all...
Isn't that like saying we shouldn't have childrens basketball because they aren't big enough to slamdunk the ball. Martial arts can be broken down into four things:Attitude, logic, basics, and fitness. You don't need these fine motor skills, you speak of, to work these concepts. We don't seem to have a problem sending kids off to gradeschool just because they aren't ready to perform advanced calculus. My comments have little to do with eight year old blackbelts by the way.
Sean
 
Touch'O'Death said:
Isn't that like saying we shouldn't have childrens basketball because they aren't big enough to slamdunk the ball. Martial arts can be broken down into four things:Attitude, logic, basics, and fitness. You don't need these fine motor skills, you speak of, to work these concepts. We don't seem to have a problem sending kids off to gradeschool just because they aren't ready to perform advanced calculus. My comments have little to do with eight year old blackbelts by the way.
Sean

I have to side with Moose on this one. Just looking at the four things you mentioned, which I don't wholeheartedly agree are what martial arts are necessarily about, I already see problems with children. Most children lack three of the things you mentioned, not that there aren't adults that lack the same traits, but children lack them on a more consistant level. Their attitude rarely has the level of maturity needed to learn even the basics of some arts, there logic is usually not developed enough to understand the reasons behind certain actions and motivations behind concepts, and their bodies are not developed enough to perform certain tasks that are required in certain arts. The basics I think many students can learn, but I could probly teach most basic techniques to a monkey. I don't think basketball involves the moral decisions that the arts require. I practice arts that teach very damaging and dangerous moves right from the start and I wouldn't want a child to know these concepts because most childten can't be trusted with a match. There are techniques in the arts I train that inflict damage during practice, damage that could stunt the growth of or damage the development of a child's body. I think there are certain arts and levels of arts that shouldn't be taught until the four things you mentioned are already firmly inbedded in the lifestyle of a youth.

I do understand the idea of using the arts to educate children about things like fitness, attitude, ect. but I also believe in teaching certain arts in very traditional ways that can't be diluted to the mentality and abilities of a child.
 
Black Bear said:
I sometimes give certain banking information to ppl to facilitate preauthorized payments and stuff. Say, a voided cheque will often do the trick. But not to a MA school that obviously sucks mud.
You are perfectly welcome to open up a seperate account for the billing agency and these billing agencies provide insurance for both students and instructors. The guy only looks at your info long enough to stuff it in an envelope and if you will notice your routing numbers and bank info are on every check you write; think of that next time you pay for gas at a Seven Eleven and hand it off to some drug addicted cashier. :uhyeah:
Sean :asian:
 
Back
Top