Agreed, but, to have great throws on one side only is limited.
You should have GREAT throws from BOTH sides. This is why we have it in our curriculum.
Only being able to throw from the right side will not always be the most efficient or best choice for a given situation, this is why I require students to be able to apply them well on both sides equally. If you do not have the ability to throw from either side you are at a disadvantage.
Bottom line is you should be able to do all your techniques from either side at will, it gives you more variety and an advantage if you are ever required to use it in self-defense.
Michael
We DO have throwing from both sides in our curriculum. It is a matter of timing though.
After 10 years of training,
student A has very good throws on one side
student B has below-average on both sides
who has the advantage?
Student A at least
has the possibility of being successful against a resisting opponent with his throws — student B? Not yet.
I'm at the point now, in our curriculum, when I have some solid throwing ability on one side, and some average on the other side.
So yea, I can do them on both sides*— and probably better on my "bad" side then a lot of martial artists who use throws have on their "good" side.
But I think our curriculum has the right idea. I am GLAD I have the high degree of comfort I do on my good side — and wouldn't sacrifice that to be somewhat better on my "bad" side.
It takes TIME and REPETITIONS to get "great", as Still Learning points out above. So we feel it is better to get that 10k reps in on ONE side, then start building the other (while continuing to build on the first side!) rather than have 5k reps on both sides.
Throws are complex and take a lot of energy to practice — moreso that kicks and punches.