the8th_light
White Belt
Hi Gerry,
Having spent a few years investigating and studying two different branches of Daito-ryu, my short answer is "it doesn't differ much". We've tried to put a decent public overview of Hakkoryu on www.hakkoryu.com. Hakkoryu's wikipedia article isn't bad, either.
In regards to the original topic, I feel it's actually pretty important to dive deeper into any school or person using the words "aiki" and "jutsu" (or "jitsu") or even "aikibudo" to describe what they're teaching. There's already been about thirty or forty years of these terms being muddied by improper use in the west.
What it really comes down to is one of two possibilities (though there are a couple of well-known exceptions). One, the person has some background in Daito-ryu. Two, the person does not, but is using the term(s) in an attempt to make a distinction between what they teach and modern Aikido. The latter is what's been clouding the pond in the last few decades.
Devon
Having spent a few years investigating and studying two different branches of Daito-ryu, my short answer is "it doesn't differ much". We've tried to put a decent public overview of Hakkoryu on www.hakkoryu.com. Hakkoryu's wikipedia article isn't bad, either.
In regards to the original topic, I feel it's actually pretty important to dive deeper into any school or person using the words "aiki" and "jutsu" (or "jitsu") or even "aikibudo" to describe what they're teaching. There's already been about thirty or forty years of these terms being muddied by improper use in the west.
What it really comes down to is one of two possibilities (though there are a couple of well-known exceptions). One, the person has some background in Daito-ryu. Two, the person does not, but is using the term(s) in an attempt to make a distinction between what they teach and modern Aikido. The latter is what's been clouding the pond in the last few decades.
Devon
Last edited: