Phoenix44
Master of Arts
One of the things that impressed me about MT, and about The Study in particular, was the higher level of discourse than I'd found most other places. And since I was active in the election process, believe me, I heard a lot. In contrast to what I'd experienced elsewhere, most (not all) of the posters here backed up their opinions with some kind of evidence, and the discussion was mostly civil. The exceptions to this were not well tolerated by the MT community, no matter what the political persuasion.
Well, I've been busy the past week or two, and I haven't visited as often. Now that I've returned, I'm shocked by the tenor of many of the discussions. Post-election, there is MORE, not less, name calling, and people seem to feel freer to post their opinion as fact, without any evidence to back them up.
Why is that? Do people think it doesn't matter any more? Do people who supported the president think that somehow the dissenters are supposed to change their opinion and rally to the Bush agenda? Do people who supported Kerry think it's appropriate to be nasty to Bush supporters?
What's going on?
Well, I've been busy the past week or two, and I haven't visited as often. Now that I've returned, I'm shocked by the tenor of many of the discussions. Post-election, there is MORE, not less, name calling, and people seem to feel freer to post their opinion as fact, without any evidence to back them up.
Why is that? Do people think it doesn't matter any more? Do people who supported the president think that somehow the dissenters are supposed to change their opinion and rally to the Bush agenda? Do people who supported Kerry think it's appropriate to be nasty to Bush supporters?
What's going on?