- Joined
- Mar 18, 2005
- Messages
- 10,826
- Reaction score
- 617
Just curious to see what everyone's preference these days, when it comes to pocket-sized (J-frame) revolvers?
Not long ago, it used to be that Smith and Wesson had a virtual monopoly on the J-frame sized revolvers. The only other companies that produced anything similar in that size were Taurus, Rossi, and Charter Arms, and none of the others were quite as good as S&W's offerings.
Ever since Colt got out of the small revolver market, the only other company that seemed to be capable of matching S&W's quality was Sturm-Ruger, but under the watch of Bill Ruger, there was no way that the terms "Ruger" and "concealable" were ever going to be mentioned in the same sentence in a positive manner. In fact, the only "compact" revolver out there by Ruger was the oversized and very heavy (all-steel) SP-101.
These days? It's a different story. Now that the elder Ruger is no longer around, the company has really taken off, putting forth new designs in polymer framed handguns, some really nice AR-15 type rifles, and yes, now the Ruger LCR, which is a J-frame sized revolver, that exhibits high quality construction, and at a reasonable price. The smoothness of the trigger on the LCR is quite impressive as well, especially given how Ruger revolvers were known for their "gritty" triggers before.
In addition to this, Taurus has really upped the quality of their offerings, to the point where they're no longer considered an inferior imitation of other products. I was actually quite impressed by the Model 85 lineup, where they now have a 6-shot J-frame sized revolver in that family.
I still have my S&W 442 and 642 (essentially the same gun, just that one is blue, the other is stainless), and both are fine weapons, but these days, if I had to buy a new small revolver, I would certainly include Ruger and Taurus as candidates.
Not long ago, it used to be that Smith and Wesson had a virtual monopoly on the J-frame sized revolvers. The only other companies that produced anything similar in that size were Taurus, Rossi, and Charter Arms, and none of the others were quite as good as S&W's offerings.
Ever since Colt got out of the small revolver market, the only other company that seemed to be capable of matching S&W's quality was Sturm-Ruger, but under the watch of Bill Ruger, there was no way that the terms "Ruger" and "concealable" were ever going to be mentioned in the same sentence in a positive manner. In fact, the only "compact" revolver out there by Ruger was the oversized and very heavy (all-steel) SP-101.
These days? It's a different story. Now that the elder Ruger is no longer around, the company has really taken off, putting forth new designs in polymer framed handguns, some really nice AR-15 type rifles, and yes, now the Ruger LCR, which is a J-frame sized revolver, that exhibits high quality construction, and at a reasonable price. The smoothness of the trigger on the LCR is quite impressive as well, especially given how Ruger revolvers were known for their "gritty" triggers before.
In addition to this, Taurus has really upped the quality of their offerings, to the point where they're no longer considered an inferior imitation of other products. I was actually quite impressed by the Model 85 lineup, where they now have a 6-shot J-frame sized revolver in that family.
I still have my S&W 442 and 642 (essentially the same gun, just that one is blue, the other is stainless), and both are fine weapons, but these days, if I had to buy a new small revolver, I would certainly include Ruger and Taurus as candidates.