We Killed Hugo Chavez?
- Thread starter celtic_crippler
- Start date
Jose E. SerranoVerified account ‏@RepJoseSerrano 
The crazy is strong in that one.
and this one:
I'm sure people mourned Hitler and Mao too...
Please do not mention that man's name again on here, it makes us throw up.
Aye, Mr. Galloway has some odd notions about politics and what is right and what is wrong.
Absurd.
What he said!
I suppose things like the 'umbrella' murder in London put such things in their minds. It's not unknown for countries to bump off other countries leaders and the CIA has an 'interesting' history when it comes to trying to dispose of leaders. The drones strike while not subtle are being used as political assassination attempts.
It may be unlikely the CIA bumped him off but I wouldn't totally dismiss it either, I bet someone suggested it and it was considered!
It may be unlikely the CIA bumped him off but I wouldn't totally dismiss it either, I bet someone suggested it and it was considered!
then again, if they were that good, they would have bumped the Sexiest man of Korea by now....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/cia-and-fbi-plan-to-assassinate-hugo-ch-vez/1296
True or not? Whatever, it's certainly plausible.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1910986,00.html
True or not? Whatever, it's certainly plausible.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1910986,00.html
Xue Sheng
All weight is underside
Well lets see...
Hugo Chávez was given a diagnosis of cancer in June of 2011 and Hugo Chávez died of complications related to cancer February 6, 2013...yeah we must have killed him...otherwise he would have never made it 1 year and 8 months after his diagnosis.
combine that with the fact that neither he or the Venezuelan government never disclosed what type of cancer he had......yeah all fingers point to it being the USA's fault
Hugo Chávez was given a diagnosis of cancer in June of 2011 and Hugo Chávez died of complications related to cancer February 6, 2013...yeah we must have killed him...otherwise he would have never made it 1 year and 8 months after his diagnosis.
combine that with the fact that neither he or the Venezuelan government never disclosed what type of cancer he had......yeah all fingers point to it being the USA's fault
Well let’s see...
Hugo Chávez was given a diagnosis of cancer in June of 2011 and Hugo Chávez died of complications related to cancer February 6, 2013...yeah we must have killed him...otherwise he would have never made it 1 year and 8 months after his diagnosis.
combine that with the fact that neither he or the Venezuelan government never disclosed what type of cancer he had......yeah all fingers point to it being the USA's fault
It was reported as cancer in the 'pelvic region', I rather think it was actually testicular cancer and they didn't want to say because his testicles were removed. That doesn't look good to macho South Americans.
I suppose old habits of thinking people are trying to bump you off are hard to kick.
The statistics on testicular cancer are horrific.It was reported as cancer in the 'pelvic region', I rather think it was actually testicular cancer and they didn't want to say because his testicles were removed. That doesn't look good to macho South Americans.
I suppose old habits of thinking people are trying to bump you off are hard to kick.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Messages
- 9,930
- Reaction score
- 1,452
The technology to induce cancer in a target has existed in a variety of ways for more than 50 years.........just sayin'. Research doctors induce cancer in lab rats all the time. Radiological agents, PCB's and other chemicals, and a host of other mutagens and viral agents can induce an assortment of cancers. Sure-if the U.S. government or one of its agencies wanted someone dead of cancer-then that person could very well die of cancer.......
Xue Sheng
All weight is underside
It was you...wasn't it :uhyeah:
Tgace
Grandmaster
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2003
- Messages
- 7,766
- Reaction score
- 409
With one shot vs gallons of chemicals or days/weeks/months of exposure? I doubt it.
hpv
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Messages
- 9,930
- Reaction score
- 1,452
I had nothing whatsoever to do with it, and don't know one way or the other; I only know it's possible. One of my son's ex-girlfriends used to threaten him with cancer from her mom's lab quite frequently....:lol:
Doubt you might, but know you would not....remember I come from an industry where someone was murdered with a radioactive source the size of a pencil eraser being placed in the middle drawer of their desk, and that several other agents really might require only one exposure-or a prolonged exposure along the nature of the middle drawer of one's desk-both the chronic exposure that you speak of, as well as acute exposures to induce cancer are more than possible. Frankly, I'm fairly certain that cancer could be induced with a single meal-but I'm not a cop, like you, I'm a scientist.........a mad scientist:lfao: :lfao: :lfao: :lfao:. Ask an oncologist, or an epidemiologist, or a toxicologist-if they tell you otherwise, it's simply because they lack the imagination, and the necessary evil bend of mind, not because it's impossible, or even unlikely. It's entirely possible, and probably has been done once or twice in the last 50 years. Deal with it.
