J
J-kid
Guest
Just a few questions can you discribe TSD kicks and how do they differ from MT and reglur TKD>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HA! there is a whole thread on Dillman's No-Touch KO. Have a ball.Originally posted by white belt
Thanks KKid. My biggest frustration is you live a few states away and I really like to help serious students and training partners like you find every drop of their potential. I'm sure you will find it w/o me. I wish I could do that teleport thing in Star Trek and show up in Dobok. I'll probably see a George Dillman Ad in Black Belt magazine teaching Chi powered teleportation now. He will probably have Spock ears on. ARRRGGHHHH! I HATE SLOP CHOPPY FLIP KICKY MCDOJANG!!!! I mean ALL types. Oh, hey, beer time!
Originally posted by white belt
Poor kicking technique is equally existant in all arts using kicks. The existance of improper technique in any MA school is not indicative of the art in general. When will people stop trying to justify themselves by implying this? 1) After collecting enough experience by associating with different Martial Artists or 2) Possibly never because they stop looking around the next bend due to the journey thus far not being sufficient to their expectations. A give up approach.
I have students, both permanent and prospective, who come in from other Martial Art schools. The roundhouse alone will be used to make my point. The 45 degree roundhouse is a medium to close range variation of the long range roundhouse. The long range roundhouse has a full basefoot pivot of 180 degrees with the basefoots toes pointed away from the target for maximum reach, power and balance. When I evaluate the prospective student, they attend a free lesson. It allows me to see what they know and it allows them to see what I expect from my students. If they are previously experienced, one tell tale quality of experience indicator is if they can do the full long range roundhouse properly. If they can't, they are either inflating their resume or were TAUGHT IMPROPERLY. I assume they did not know better and offer diplomatically to help them achieve proper technical proficiency by learning at my school. 99 percent of the time I have to start them at a lower rank than what they held previously. If they want to try and continue, I sign them up for only a 90 day membership. This protects them, in their minds, from potential abuse and I can see if after 90 days they are truly trying to adapt and excel. If they are not following instruction, and are not correcting their technique, I politely explain the best recourse is not to continue at my Do Jang. They are then free to move on. Those types usually bail before meeting with me because they can read the writing on the wall before the 90 days are up. The true seekers swallow their pride and make a new level of effort. The ones who want to perpetuate their poor experience consider my classes too hard and make excuses that are rather shallow and/or embarassing. They then end up at a belt factory usually not far away. They are happy and I can keep free of any contamination in my school. They come from other TKD schools, some Karate schools AND SOME TANG SOO DO SCHOOLS. Yes, you are reading that correctly. In fact, the TSD school, most prominant in my area, is known for 45 minute to 1 hour classes and they do VERY little sparring. I teach a minimum of ONE AND A HALF HOUR CLASSES. We spar EVERY session a MINIMUM of 3 two minute rounds. Now here is the real kicker (pun intended).... I am WTF affiliated. I also have a clear understanding that there are a good number of TSD schools and Karate schools that DO compare with my schools dedication. I will not allow a POORLY TAUGHT TSD or KARATE practicioner, investigating my school, to skew my view of other TSD and Karate schools overall or even for the most part. No way in hell. It would be unfair and make me look rather naive not to mention dishonest. If you are involved in a bad school, get out or suffer it until you find something better, but why continuously display your lack of insight based on your present situation? It doesn't do you justice as a Martial Artist or a peer. Regardless of the local TSD schools rep. in my area, and your slant against WTF TKD, I appreciate and respect TSD enough to not bash it on a forum because of the aforementioned. I know that your bias and that school are not general indicators to that wonderful art. I really admire yours and others sense of honor toward good teachings, but there will always be McDoJangs/McDoJos in all arts so long as there are underacheivers. Why not set a NEW YEARS RESOLUTION to be the one woman turning point in that DoJang and SMOKE THE HELL OUT OF EVERY OTHER STUDENT IN THERE PERFORMANCE WISE? Now that would help you improve and maybe improve the quality of experience of some others like you that may have the same thoughts in that very DoJang. Make the best of your energy expenditures and share them on-line so others in your position can also dominate their circumstance. Bottom line, go politely kick some ***!!!!!
white belt
p.s.
TKD schools are more common than any other type of MA school presently. Back when Judo was the number 1 practiced Marial Art in the U.S., there were more Judo McDojos around than Karate McDojos. It was just simple law of averages. It did not mean that all Judo (Olympic and otherwise) sucked. One of the oldtimers can jump in and verify this very easily.
Originally posted by white belt
That was very nice of you to say, Ken. I struggle with keeping my perspective at times. I have so many people try to bamboozle me it's not funny. It's as difficult to not be a victim business wise as it is self defense wise. So many people, and some very nice ones, have a skewed point of reference from a McDoJang experience. They then must be convinced that it is their experience that was lacking, not that I'm expecting unrealistic things from them when training with me. I'm sure I am not alone. The premise of this thread seems to be evidence of that.