FearlessFreep
Senior Master
One thing I've been thinking about this week has to do with distance in evasion.
Assuming a normal fighting stance, and my opponent throws a kicking attack.
If I evade to the rear..slide step...then I really don't have to move far. Maybe about six inches will make their roundhouse, for example, miss, and still have me close enough to throw a counter-strike. I think lateral movements require you to go more distance to clear the attacking foot, which leaves you needing to cover more ground to counter strike. On the other hand, moving laterally completely changes the angles and I think can throw your opponent off.
Maybe an example: From open stance, my opponent throws a rear-leg roundhouse-
1) Slide step back a short-distance (6 inches) and immediatley come back with a front side hop-to roundhouse as their foot is coming down.
Advantage: short distance and fast response to catch them before they've set and can prepare the next move.
Disadvantage: short distance means that if they are doing a quick step-in to close some distance before throwing the attack, you could find yourself not really getting back far enough and being right in the attack. Also, linear back and forth motion seems fairly common and they may be expecting a straight on counter strike.
2) Slide step 90 degrees to side (away from kick) and counter-strike with a rear-leg side-kick straight to the body
Advantage: comes from unexpected angle. Side-kick could set them off balance for easier follow ups.
Disadvantage: slower. Need to slide further out to avoid kick and rear-leg side-kick takes longer to launch
Note: you could also roundhouse into the ribs from that position, I think. Not sure of the relative adv/disadv
3) Slide step 45 degrees forward and punch or double punch
Advantage: Probabably a real surprise to come in at an off angle. Double punch could push opponent back for follow up
Disadvantage: If you are close enough to punch, close enough to be punched
Probably requires longest slide.
I can think of others (such as backward 45 degree slides and various attacks from those positions) but the general thought is that for optimum counter-strike, different directions require different distance
No real point or question, just some random thoughts...mostly trying to organize my own...
Assuming a normal fighting stance, and my opponent throws a kicking attack.
If I evade to the rear..slide step...then I really don't have to move far. Maybe about six inches will make their roundhouse, for example, miss, and still have me close enough to throw a counter-strike. I think lateral movements require you to go more distance to clear the attacking foot, which leaves you needing to cover more ground to counter strike. On the other hand, moving laterally completely changes the angles and I think can throw your opponent off.
Maybe an example: From open stance, my opponent throws a rear-leg roundhouse-
1) Slide step back a short-distance (6 inches) and immediatley come back with a front side hop-to roundhouse as their foot is coming down.
Advantage: short distance and fast response to catch them before they've set and can prepare the next move.
Disadvantage: short distance means that if they are doing a quick step-in to close some distance before throwing the attack, you could find yourself not really getting back far enough and being right in the attack. Also, linear back and forth motion seems fairly common and they may be expecting a straight on counter strike.
2) Slide step 90 degrees to side (away from kick) and counter-strike with a rear-leg side-kick straight to the body
Advantage: comes from unexpected angle. Side-kick could set them off balance for easier follow ups.
Disadvantage: slower. Need to slide further out to avoid kick and rear-leg side-kick takes longer to launch
Note: you could also roundhouse into the ribs from that position, I think. Not sure of the relative adv/disadv
3) Slide step 45 degrees forward and punch or double punch
Advantage: Probabably a real surprise to come in at an off angle. Double punch could push opponent back for follow up
Disadvantage: If you are close enough to punch, close enough to be punched

I can think of others (such as backward 45 degree slides and various attacks from those positions) but the general thought is that for optimum counter-strike, different directions require different distance
No real point or question, just some random thoughts...mostly trying to organize my own...