No particular situation has compelled me ask this, but just a chat with a colleague. It happened because I had to deal with an abusive female at work, none of the verbals was directed towards myself, just another female. Now as I know all too well what the UK law side of things is not even worth exploring, and this is just hypothetical as a situation. Even in the day job, we have to be always conscious of the fact that any allegation could be costly for us. We would still face the suspension of our licence until investigated.
We have reasoned that if it was possible to carry Pepper spray, we would be able to at least convey some perceived authority over the female. IE, the chance of kicking off would be diminished if you are going to get face full of Pepper spray. Now we are not coppers obviously, but my colleague and I are curious as to whether this approach is adopted to use the good old CYA (cover your ###e). I dont just mean randomly spraying females, but if you had a situation that has escalated up to being verbal and threats are starting to materialise, would you spray rather than try to restrain. More to the point, would it be legal too?
The thought here is that with a male, you are less likely to get an assault charge, or at least alleged. With a female, so many allegations can be made. So in this context, would that be a defence if it got that far. Could you reason to the authorities that you sprayed because you were trying to protect yourself, and the female from injury for example? When my colleague and I were discussing this, it seems like a common sense approach. This is of course being a situation where the female is static, but using threatening language giving cause to believe that the copper is likely facing a tangible threat.
We have reasoned that if it was possible to carry Pepper spray, we would be able to at least convey some perceived authority over the female. IE, the chance of kicking off would be diminished if you are going to get face full of Pepper spray. Now we are not coppers obviously, but my colleague and I are curious as to whether this approach is adopted to use the good old CYA (cover your ###e). I dont just mean randomly spraying females, but if you had a situation that has escalated up to being verbal and threats are starting to materialise, would you spray rather than try to restrain. More to the point, would it be legal too?
The thought here is that with a male, you are less likely to get an assault charge, or at least alleged. With a female, so many allegations can be made. So in this context, would that be a defence if it got that far. Could you reason to the authorities that you sprayed because you were trying to protect yourself, and the female from injury for example? When my colleague and I were discussing this, it seems like a common sense approach. This is of course being a situation where the female is static, but using threatening language giving cause to believe that the copper is likely facing a tangible threat.