The real Shirley Sherrod scandal: By John Stossel

billc

Grandmaster
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
9,183
Reaction score
85
Location
somewhere near Lake Michigan
This articel and the show the article is about covers the scandal that Shirley Sherrod, from the O'keefe video is involved in.

http://stossel.blogs.foxbusiness.co...tonight-on-fox-news-at-10pm-et/#ixzz1Hfohw1UH

From the article:

Want to get a check from the government for $50,000? If you’re black and willing to say you once “attempted to farm,” the money could be yours.
Why? In the 80’s and 90’s, some Black farmers were allegedly discriminated against by the Agriculture Department. Department loan officers supposedly did the opposite of what Shirley Sherrod was accused of: they granted government-subsidized farm loans to whites but not to blacks.
Government shouldn’t be giving out government subsidized loans to anyone. But that’s another story for another time.
When some black farmers sued, claiming discrimination, the USDA agreed to pay $50,000 to every black person who was discriminated against.
According to the census, there were 18,000 black farmers in the country when the lawsuit was filed. But 97,000 black “farmers” have applied for the money.

Despite the fraud, Congress approved $1billion in payments, and when that ran out, authorized another $1.25 billion dollars. Some victims of discrimination may benefit. But plenty of money will go to freeloaders.
And speaking of freeloaders, lots of money will go to lawyers: In the first round of $1 billion, Cross estimates, about $40 to $50 million was paid out to lawyers. We called the USDA to get an exact number, but spokeswoman Courtney Rowe said she couldn’t say how much had been paid to lawyers – that the Treasury Department had actually issued the checks, and to talk with them. A Treasury Department spokeswoman did not respond to our questions.


Read more: http://stossel.blogs.foxbusiness.co...tonight-on-fox-news-at-10pm-et/#ixzz1HihbG6fg



 
According to the census, there were 18,000 black farmers in the country when the lawsuit was filed. But 97,000 black “farmers” have applied for the money.

Despite the fraud, Congress approved $1billion in payments, and when that ran out, authorized another $1.25 billion dollars. Some victims of discrimination may benefit. But plenty of money will go to freeloaders.


Uhh...Congress authorized an additional 70,000 applications-regardless of what the census said-by passage of a bill in 2008, and signing of that bill into law by George W. Bush.​
 
It would be fraud on the part of the people who didn't deserve the settlement, no matter what the government does.
 
"Didn't deserve" doesn't necessarily mean "aren't eligible," and that's what constitutes fraud in this instance.
So, there is no moral component for you? Some "farmers" had potted plants...
 
There have been many explanations of the discrepancy between the two numbers, both from governmental and non-governmental sources.

Not that you are at all interested, of course.
 
Yes, it is just a little discrepancy, 18,000 increased to 97,000. I guess that is just government math for you.
 
Another article on the Pigford fraud case:

http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2011/03/26/my-quick-take-on-stossels-pigford-segment/

from the article:

The bigger fraud, however, has been perpetrated on the legitimate black farmers whose cases and stories were hijacked; people like Arkansas farmer Jimmy Dismuke, who was shown in the story. The ‘$50,000 check’ fraud was done on the back of hard working farmers who actually did suffer discrimination at the hands of a huge government organization with no real accountability. In fact, part of the reason the USDA has played along with writing those $50,000 checks to people is to keep the status quo at the USDA.
 
At biggovernment.com the Pigford investigation continues:

http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan...t-conspiracies-against-the-u-s-treasury-ever/

From the article: There is a video that acompanies the article.

In this video, we introduce you to Lucious Abrams, a Georgia farmer who was one of the seven original claimants. Abrams has spent years working for justice only to be betrayed by people like the Congressional Black Caucus. Now Lucious is speaking out and speaking truth to the power structure that doesn’t speak for him.
When a group like Color of Change wants to silence investigation into Pigford, it’s farmers like Lucious Abrams they are silencing.
When liberals on sites like DailyKos try to bully Rep. Steve King and Rep. Michele Bachmann with charges of racism, it’s really farmers like Lucious Abrams they are bullying.
 
Back
Top