Milt G.
Purple Belt
Hello,
The "Kenpo Continuum" book...
Out a little more then a year now. Thoughts, feelings, ideas?
I thought it was a wonderful project that was well done and worthy of praise. Almost everywhere I travel the book has been at least heard of, and often owned by someone around. It was really nice to hear the stories of other practitioners. Many of which I had only heard of and never met. I now make it a point to introduce myself to those in the book I manage to "run into" along the way. I feel as if I know them better, for knowing their story.
I thought I would wait until the book was out a bit and ask for feedback. No, not "official" feedback, just feedback in general. I do not represent the books author, or publisher.
Positive and negative input is welcome. I do know that some were "less then enamored" with the book, and the project in general. Seems like most felt it was a worthwhile endeavor.
I know the book does not contain a "true" cross section of Kenpo as a whole, as for one reason or another, many did not participate. Many did not even have the opportunity. I respect the rights of all practitioners, regardless of their participation or reasoning.
I feel that, overall, it is useful and well received. I would like to know how others in the Ken/mpo community feel about it? Or if they have even seen or heard of it?
Much thanks, in advance, for your thoughts and insight.
Milt G.
The "Kenpo Continuum" book...
Out a little more then a year now. Thoughts, feelings, ideas?
I thought it was a wonderful project that was well done and worthy of praise. Almost everywhere I travel the book has been at least heard of, and often owned by someone around. It was really nice to hear the stories of other practitioners. Many of which I had only heard of and never met. I now make it a point to introduce myself to those in the book I manage to "run into" along the way. I feel as if I know them better, for knowing their story.
I thought I would wait until the book was out a bit and ask for feedback. No, not "official" feedback, just feedback in general. I do not represent the books author, or publisher.
Positive and negative input is welcome. I do know that some were "less then enamored" with the book, and the project in general. Seems like most felt it was a worthwhile endeavor.
I know the book does not contain a "true" cross section of Kenpo as a whole, as for one reason or another, many did not participate. Many did not even have the opportunity. I respect the rights of all practitioners, regardless of their participation or reasoning.
I feel that, overall, it is useful and well received. I would like to know how others in the Ken/mpo community feel about it? Or if they have even seen or heard of it?
Much thanks, in advance, for your thoughts and insight.
Milt G.