I heard this question for so long and heard a lot of answer i just wanna know yours ? It seems that there are two philosophies when it comes to stick training. One were the stick is actually considered a sword and the other, it is just a stick.
The questions is this. Is there an advantage to one way of training over the other, and what are you think can explain those ideas?
I heard this question for so long and heard a lot of answer i just wanna know yours ? It seems that there are two philosophies when it comes to stick training. One were the stick is actually considered a sword and the other, it is just a stick.
The questions is this. Is there an advantage to one way of training over the other, and what are you think can explain those ideas?
My initial research to non FMA would be that since we are more likely to have a stick in your hand than a sword and it is much easier to pick up a sticks anywhere than the blades, They think, training stick as stick might be more applicable in street than the blades.
However, I would imagine that more precision and awareness is required when simulating blade techniques with a stick, therefore your movement, foot work, and defense would improve more when training stick as sword and training with the concepts of the Blades correct your forms and the effectivity of the Arts as well as the weapons translation is very easy and yet very applicable to blunted if you train with sword and knives than translating stick to bladed which you need a lot of movements and concept that to train and learn.
your ideas?
Gumagalang,
Isagani
http://www.martialtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=26597
The questions is this. Is there an advantage to one way of training over the other, and what are you think can explain those ideas?
I heard this question for so long and heard a lot of answer i just wanna know yours ? It seems that there are two philosophies when it comes to stick training. One were the stick is actually considered a sword and the other, it is just a stick.
The questions is this. Is there an advantage to one way of training over the other, and what are you think can explain those ideas?
My initial research to non FMA would be that since we are more likely to have a stick in your hand than a sword and it is much easier to pick up a sticks anywhere than the blades, They think, training stick as stick might be more applicable in street than the blades.
However, I would imagine that more precision and awareness is required when simulating blade techniques with a stick, therefore your movement, foot work, and defense would improve more when training stick as sword and training with the concepts of the Blades correct your forms and the effectivity of the Arts as well as the weapons translation is very easy and yet very applicable to blunted if you train with sword and knives than translating stick to bladed which you need a lot of movements and concept that to train and learn.
your ideas?
Gumagalang,
Isagani
http://www.martialtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=26597