Kenpojujitsu3
Master Black Belt
- Joined
- May 5, 2005
- Messages
- 1,221
- Reaction score
- 9
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a bit put off by these clips.
Sean
And he is too far away for that Thundering Hammers, breakes posture way too much, and fails to align his body with his outward motion.I dunno. It just seems like the techs go on and on and on, way past the point of having any meaning. This kind of thing has been discussed in the past. I know, the idea is that you "automatically flow into the next move" if something doesn't go right. I just disagree, I think he is taking a whole lot for granted, to work a technique out to move number 58, or so. I mean, I think I saw a couple places where he applied a restraining hold, like an armlock, and then LET THE ARM GO! so he could go back to pummelling the guy, who kindly remained where he was, to be pummelled some more.
I personally think it makes sense to plan techs out to maybe 2 or 3, or perhaps 4 followups, but beyond that, you just absolutely cannot make any assumptions about what will happen, and to where you will "automatically flow" next.
Practicing like this doesn't give you something to flow into if the prior move went wrong. The only way the bad guy will be in place for that next move, is if everything prior went RIGHT. And if it all went right, there is no reason for the tech to still be happening. It should have ended ages ago. It's just making some dangerously false assumptions. If the prior move went wrong, the guy is probably nowhere near where he would need to be for you to flow into the next move.
I just think it's overdone.
True:angel:You're a bit put off by anything that isn't Kenpo 2000
True:angel:
Also, Mr. Hawkins, I wanted to thank you for all the excellent kenpo related video clips you have placed on YouTube. I have found them to be an informational and entertaining resource, and I greatly appreciate the effort.
Also, Mr. Hawkins, I wanted to thank you for all the excellent kenpo related video clips you have placed on YouTube. I have found them to be an informational and entertaining resource, and I greatly appreciate the effort.
Also, Mr. Hawkins, I wanted to thank you for all the excellent kenpo related video clips you have placed on YouTube. I have found them to be an informational and entertaining resource, and I greatly appreciate the effort.
Control is a big part of a successful demonstration.He hurries to much and forgets to complete his strikes.
My the 16 year old son entered a self-defense compitition once. Everyone else was do their techniques similarto the demos above. We reviewed the attacks and I told him to be ready because I was going to try to hit him as hard as I could and he should pop me back so I responded appropriately. I thought it went well but he was dramatically down graded for excess violence. (It was a "karate" competition and he didn't draw blood and only bruised me once.)
I still believe that the attacks need to be realistic and the dummies need to avoid the stone statue response to the defense. The defender should pop the stone statue at least hard enough to remind them to move. Also never move faster than your attacker can respond to your defense. I take selfe defense technique practice as the opportunity to learn to manipulate my partner into the positions I want and not as an opportunity to move as quickly as I can.
thanks,
Jeff
Control is a big part of a successful demonstration.
Sean
If you are refering to Kenpodoc's post, as I was, the judges weren't fooled by that little secret.He did show control, his dummy is still there and not bleeding.
When we do demos we get people who say "it looks like you are really hitting the other guy." The secret is, we are.
If you are refering to Kenpodoc's post, as I was, the judges weren't fooled by that little secret.
Sean