I'm sure everyone has heard of the practice of writing messages on bombs and taking pictures of them before they are deployed. Apparently, in New Zealand, if you do this, you will be removed from the combat theater and the action will be judged as unprofessional and inappropriate.
See this article
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10597952
And
This got me thinking about the various deep cultural differences that have developed between the various countries that once could count a number of things in common. In the USA, this practice would be praised, but over the pond, it is condemned? Does the US have a cavalier attitude toward war that is generally looked down upon by the rest of the world or are the Kiwis being overly sensitive to something everyone else is doing?
What do you think?
See this article
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10597952
"Irrespective of the investigation into whether the acts contravened military law, the NZDF sets and expects very high levels of professionalism and behaviour from its people - this is especially the case in an operational theatre where the protection of information is vital to the overall security of New Zealand interests and activities," AVM Stockwell said.
And
"These three are returning to New Zealand because of a series of actions and errors of judgment on their part that did not meet the standards we expect of our people."
This got me thinking about the various deep cultural differences that have developed between the various countries that once could count a number of things in common. In the USA, this practice would be praised, but over the pond, it is condemned? Does the US have a cavalier attitude toward war that is generally looked down upon by the rest of the world or are the Kiwis being overly sensitive to something everyone else is doing?
What do you think?