Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw that or something similar anyway and the promoter and trainer was an absolute scum bag. A loan shark and a thug who enjoyed hurting people and had been in prison numerous times. Hardly w great advertisement for the sportI believe that Netflix has a docuseries where they follow a bareknuckle gym and fighters. I have not seen it yet, so I can't comment on the quality etc.
It is called "Bare Knuckle Fight Club" and is about a gym in the UK.
I saw that or something similar anyway and the promoter and trainer was an absolute scum bag. A loan shark and a thug who enjoyed hurting people and had been in prison numerous times. Hardly w great advertisement for the sport
Haven’t had a chance to watch the videos yet. Do they explain the rule set for competition? I suspect the technical differences between pre-Queensbury pugilism and modern boxing has as much to do with the change in the rules as with the presence or absence of gloves.
It can be more than one thing. Boxing technique may have changed because of the rules and also changed because many, many people experimented to find what worked best. In the modern age, boxers and trainers study video of the greatest fighters in the game to analyze how they move. That wasn’t possible 150 years ago.Yeah. There was a brief article on it. Apparently it is a half and half. Two minute rounds but you can clinch fight.
Bare Knuckle FC debut delivers plenty of action not for the faint of heart
I still think boxing just got better. Be like saying john Jones couldn't have walked away with UFC 1
The question is, suppose the rules had stayed the same (pre-Queensbury), but the art had continued to evolve with the experience of thousands of fighters and the advent of video. Would the result be more like modern boxing, original pugilism, MMM boxing, or something else entirely?It can be more than one thing. Boxing technique may have changed because of the rules and also changed because many, many people experimented to find what worked best. In the modern age, boxers and trainers study video of the greatest fighters in the game to analyze how they move. That wasn’t possible 150 years ago.
The question is, suppose the rules had stayed the same (pre-Queensbury), but the art had continued to evolve with the experience of thousands of fighters and the advent of video. Would the result be more like modern boxing, original pugilism, MMM boxing, or something else entirely?