dcsma
Orange Belt
Just curious here and to see what everyone has to say from experience or not on the Tony Blauers S.P.E.A.R. system?? Worth the $200 for a 8 hour seminar?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, and it has a lot to do with where you are and what you need in that moment. I tend to get more out of seminars now than I did 20 years ago, but I don't get my best benefits from the same kinds of seminars now.I am going to agree with Buka. Whether you get something good out of the seminar has more to do with you then with the presenter. Tony has some good stuff but....is it what you want? Why are you interested in working with him ? Are you familiar with what he does? I would suggest watching all his youtube stuff and decide if it is something you really need to know more about.
If this is all she knows then I definitely wouldn't take it. If she has extensive training in other martial arts then you may be able to get enough out of it to piece things together a higher understanding of it. Sometimes all you need is a hint to get you thinking in the right direction. If she has a really strong martial art background including application then it will be worth the the $200 assuming that this amount means that you can also ask deeper questions.There is a lady who is teaching the system in the area and only has a year an half experience in the system.
I would not pay money to take a seminar from someone who only has a year and a half experience with the method.Ok thank you for the input. There is a lady who is teaching the system in the area and only has a year an half experience in the system. Always looking for added knowledge but the lack of experience was concerning
I took the question to be regarding a seminar with Tony Blauer himself, not the local teacher who has minimal experience.I would not pay money to take a seminar from someone who only has a year and a half experience with the method.
I'm not a fan of seminars anyway, but this would definitely be one to stay away from, in my opinion.
It's a little steep, but if it's really 8 hours (spread over a couple of days, I would imagine), then it's not too out of line with what many people on the seminar circuit are charging.I know nothing of the system, so won't comment on it's functionality, but I would question what's really motivating someone charging $200 for a seminar.
It's a little steep, but if it's really 8 hours (spread over a couple of days, I would imagine), then it's not too out of line with what many people on the seminar circuit are charging.
Don't do it lol...
Here's the deal about 8 hour seminars. Can you learn your system in 8 hours? in a year? If not then don't expect this seminar to make you a warrior I find that self-defense seminars that show cases these techniques are best suited for someone who is already training in some kind of martial art, which is why gpseymour gets more out of these seminars now than he did 20 years ago.
In short seminars like this are more of an applications seminar where someone says here's the technique and here's how to apply it in a possible real life scenario. For example: The stuff that he shows here are things that are taught by default in Kung Fu
The only difference between what he is teaching and what is taught in martial arts is that a strong parry to his guard will screw up his day. The concept of hand placement as a way to encourage your opponent to do a certain attack is nothing new. If you notice he says that if you try to spar with this then you'll get your butt kick.
This has kung fu written all over it. I would have been the smart *** who would have put my hand only an inch from the medicine ball and blast it out of his grip. lol.
Martial Arts already incorporate this concept in the forms, techniques, and combinations
A lot of the things he's going to go over are things that you are probably already training in your school, the only difference is that you are going to see the application version of some of the techniques that are found in Martial Arts. Some of them you'll be able to do and some of them you won't be able to do because you don't have the understanding of how to properly drive the power for the technique.
If this is all she knows then I definitely wouldn't take it. If she has extensive training in other martial arts then you may be able to get enough out of it to piece things together a higher understanding of it. Sometimes all you need is a hint to get you thinking in the right direction. If she has a really strong martial art background including application then it will be worth the the $200 assuming that this amount means that you can also ask deeper questions.
My personal opinion is that you probably can learn a lot of what he teaches just by connecting with other instructors and Sifu's out there. You'll get more than 8 hours worth of information and you'll build reliable networks of friends that will be more than happen to share application knowledge with you.
It's $200 for 8 hours. Usually at costs like that the people attending have some kind of background in self-defense and this is would be a deeper look. Most martial arts that train for self-defense give a deeper look into the techniques as the student progresses. From the instructors that I've met, they are more than happy to provide deeper knowledge to a student who really has a passion for the system or a similar system.I know nothing of the system, so won't comment on it's functionality, but I would question what's really motivating someone charging $200 for a seminar.
Here are things that I'm not impressed with.The thing with Seminars like this though, and the videos you show don't real show it, is that it goes a lot deeper into tactics. It also incorporates natural reactions etc. The following video is the first in a series that go into precontract cues, exploiting natural reactions vs fighting them etc which most martial arts don't really get into that much. The later we can say "okay, that works if you aren't practicing martial arts daily" but the precontract cues and the like are vital.
It's $200 for 8 hours. Usually at costs like that the people attending have some kind of background in self-defense and this is would be a deeper look. Most martial arts that train for self-defense give a deeper look into the techniques as the student progresses. From the instructors that I've met, they are more than happy to provide deeper knowledge to a student who really has a passion for the system or a similar system.
Here are things that I'm not impressed with.
1. Aiming for nerve clusters (0:10) - The deal with nerve clusters is that you don't really aim for them. The technique is what gets you there. All of that repetitive drilling and correct arm position that martial arts students is what makes it possible to hit the nerve clusters that he is talking about. You may not hit the nerve on the first try, but if the technique is correct then your worst case scenario is that you'll block the punch. From there it becomes a game of chance and considering that you are using the same blocking technique for, say a jab, then your chances of hitting that nerve cluster increases with each punch you block. It doesn't matter if you block a left punch or a right punch the technique plus conditioning will get you there. As far as nerve clusters in the arm, those are easy to reach. There is one on the top and one the bottom.
2. The flinch mechanism (0:38) that he speaks of is old news. Martial arts already utilizes flinch movements. For example, the parry is a natural flinch movement. What do you naturally do if there is a bug flying around your face?
Here's better view of that natural parry. Guess how I teach my 5 year old student how to parry? I tell her to swat the fly.
3. Unconscious Reaction Vs. Conscious reaction - It is probably more accurate to say subconscious. If you are unconscious then you aren't responding to anything. The body is always aware provided that we aren't having a day dreaming spell or some type of tunneled focus. This is how we are able to catch things out of the corner of our eye even though we aren't actively making an effort to look for it.
4: Complex motor skill vs Primal motor skill (1:58) - Both require a timing range for success, don't let anyone fool you about that. If he's late throwing up his guard he still gets hit. This is where multiple techniques of blocking come into play. If you see that you are late in using one type of block then your knowledge of techniques will fire off a different type of block or motion that will help you get out of the way. If you notice his block still was exact timing. He got his hands up for the block at the same time the punch was coming in. As far as you knowing which punch is coming at you. You actually have the ability to encourage your attacker to throw certain punches. When you are able to do this then it doesn't become such a guessing game any more because you know what direction most of the punches are going to come from. This is also covered in every martial arts via stance training, one step partner drills, and sparring.
5. Action vs Reaction (4:00) - Action is not always faster than Reaction. Visual training and learning how to use peripheral vision will allow your reaction to be faster than a person's action. Peripheral vision is a natural motion detection that makes it possible to see a punch before it is actually thrown. This is also covered in Martial Arts as well. For example, he states that if he sees you starting to throw a punch then it will start the flinch. If I see you throw a punch then it's going to initiate a trained response of my choosing.
6. When a police officer walks up to someone he should maintain the necessary distance to provide maximum reaction time. Walking up to someone and getting into someone's face the way he did reduces your reaction time, unless you are the person that will be initiating the attack. If you have no plans to initiate an attack then the distance needs to be far enough to make a sucker punch attack more difficult.
I took the question to be regarding a seminar with Tony Blauer himself, not the local teacher who has minimal experience.
If it's with Blauer, then it might be worthwhile. If it's with an instructor who only has 1.5 years experience then definitely not.
I'd want lunch too for that muchIt's a little steep, but if it's really 8 hours (spread over a couple of days, I would imagine), then it's not too out of line with what many people on the seminar circuit are charging.