How useful are the one steps that you teach or train in do you believe in what you are being tought or do you go though the motion of them and discard them like an old rag?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How useful are the one steps that you teach or train in do you believe in what you are being tought or do you go though the motion of them and discard them like an old rag?
That's why I'm really interested in kidswarrior's idea of replacing the classical 1-step with a realistic fighting-based kind of sparring practice. I'm really curious about what he, as well as some of the other posters in this thread who seem to be on a similar page with him, can come up with in the way of effective combat training drills. You guys who do this: why not camcord some of your students' training exchanges using these methods and post them to MT? I'm always in the market for something that actually works.
Sounds like they are master keys.We only have five - but there are a few variations of each of the five.
For testing, we have to do the five, plus create an unknown number on the spot.
Many of my students are legally wards of the court, so video taping (even still photos) are verbotten. But may I suggest you check out the Kung Fu San Soo clips I found a week or two ago and posted on the Southern Chinese MA section of MT? That might give us a basis for further discussion. And we have some other San Soo guys here, too, and some Sanda guys (one in particular is world-renowned for his tree-hitting prowess ). I believe Sanda (police/military form) and Kung Fu San Soo have some strong similarities.
Our one-steps are not scripted... the criteria are "1 attack, 1 block, counter"... that's all that is given. There are no illegal targets, no illegal attacks, nothing - all the things that cannot be done in free sparring can be done in step-sparring. The only difference between step sparring and hol-sin-sul (self-defense) as we teach it, is that step sparring should focus primarily on the TKD techniques (e.g. kicking and punching), although some controls, throws, etc., are allowed as long as there is a predominance of TKD techniques, whereas hol-sin-sul is intended to showcase releases, throws, controls, and joint attacks - which we don't use in free sparring.
although I think that the releases, locks and so on were part of classical TKD
Sounds good to me (although I think that the releases, locks and so on were part of classical TKDTKD in the kwan era, before the move to purge such elements from the syllabus, parallel to what happened in karate (contrary to the advice of Funakoshi, Motobu and so on; but that's what you get when you make ring competition practice the background assumption of your curriculum...)). If I were designing a complete TKD instructional sequence, I'd seriously consider using a modified version of that approach, I think. You're teaching a very progressive curriculum there, Kaceyfrom what I've seen and heard, most one-step teaching is of the stilted, tournament sparring range kind, where uke steps in from about eight feet away. For a long time, the idea of `unscripted one-steps' would have seemed an oxymoron to mearen't they all scripted?? But in my exchange with Brad, and now based on what you, Mark and a few other people are saying, it strikes me that my understanding of `one-step' has probably been a bit too narrow....