Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No way. That kick would've gone right through an attempted block. Not too familiar with wtf style sparring eh?DeLamar.J said:Keeping the hands up could have avoided the whole thing. A real pitty.
I have never sparred before.Gemini said:No way. That kick would've gone right through an attempted block. Not too familiar with wtf style sparring eh?
2 observations.
1. The kicker (Red) was telegraphing a back kick and the attacker (Blue) never picked up on it. Moving counter clockwise and/or a feint would have tipped the kickers hand. The kicker did a very smart thing though. When you throw such a kick, by falling down afterwards protects you from a counter kick in case you miss. (Can't kick someone on the ground).
2. The attacher (Blue) was bouncing in an extremely predictable manner. When he finally went to make his move, notice how much lower he bends his legs to lunge himself. That's all the kicker was looking for.
Well executed kick though.
This is probably true. A "block" or guards up would not likely have done much, but the use of arms extended might have covered the kick, and kept it away from the head. This kick shows the power of a well executed Taekwondo kick - - fast, unpredictable, easily reaches the head, and results in a knock out, even through the protective headgear. My guess is this was a slap with bottom of the foot. A heel kick with no headgear could be even more deadly.Gemini said:No way. That kick would've gone right through an attempted block. Not too familiar with wtf style sparring eh?
This might be considered a smart move, but if the referee determines that it is an intentional ploy, it is illegal by WTF and USAT Olympic rules, and a good referee would have invalidated the point (no corner judges allowed to record a point), and penalized the attacker.Gemini said:The kicker did a very smart thing though. When you throw such a kick, by falling down afterwards protects you from a counter kick in case you miss. (Can't kick someone on the ground).
Gemini said:Ah, quite right. I stand corrected. :asian:
However, if it was determined that the falling down was unintentional, (which you'd never convince me of) then it would've counted as 3 points. 2 for the head shot and 1 for the knock down, correct?
Though yes, the KO making it a moot point anywho.
Yes, current WTF/USAT rules are two for the head, and one for the knock down - total 3 points, but the KO does eliminate the need to count points. I don't know what the current "school of thought" is with the USA Taekwondo rules as far as intentionality of falling in connection with a kick. Under USTU, we would have invalidated the point if the fall was associated with the kick (intentional or not) simply because a kick should be executed while remaining standing (rules of fair play). If the fall came seconds after the kick, then intentionality would be an issue, but it would not invalidate the point if they were not directly connected - tough call.Gemini said:Ah, quite right. I stand corrected. :asian:
However, if it was determined that the falling down was unintentional, (which you'd never convince me of) then it would've counted as 3 points. 2 for the head shot and 1 for the knock down, correct?
Though yes, the KO making it a moot point anywho.