Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How's it going clfsean? I agree with you. The techniques seem to be the same ones that one would see from a movie vs what is often trained in a school. I to a lot of crane and tiger and very little looks like what is being shown. The tiger stuff is like a tiger hiding in the grass. The crane stuff is subtle and deceptive, where it looks like it won't do much because it doesn't have that same method of generating the power like tiger does.... Not the way I'd perform any of that nor teach that ...
... Not the way I'd perform any of that nor teach that ...
So than how would you perform or teach it? Do you teach such styles?
In my experience, the animal is reflected more in the underlying principles and methodologies, more like an over all physical education. It is less about what the techniques look like, although that does play some part, but often not what the general uneducated public assumes it would be.
In Tibetan White Crane, we punch with the fist in various ways and the crane is reflected in how we train our full-body power by driving with the feet and turning thru the waist. We use very few stylized crane beak strikes or single-leg "crane stances". That is stereotypical stuff and not really what it is all about.
Well, I guess everyone has their interpretation of how it all comes together. I read their five animals bit, and their section on crane, I don't like assigning personalities. I don't feel that it is about trying to become the animal. We are people, we have certain natural weapons as people, and those natural weapons are different from what animals have. However, animals can give us insights to develop the use of our natural weapons to a higher level. This is a physical education, but it is not trying to become the animal. In Tibetan crane, the crane has given insights into efficient use of the body, but we still move and fight as people.You mean like this?
Shaolin Academy, Shaolin Kung Fu 5 Animal Personality Styles
This group has assigned personality traits to each of the 4 main shaolin animals with explanations on how each group acts in both fighting and in normal situations. It's quite a fascinating read and even if you don't fully agree with it, it does show that there is a lot more to the animal styles than the physical moves.
Also, with regards to your fighting style, it seems you hold the same principles as we do. Like you we rarely use the "crane beak" or "crane stances" (those are mostly seen in northern shaolin crane) and our 3 core principles are 1) a good solid stance, 2) a flexible waist and 3) relaxed whipping arms.
The Chinese history on that page is not all together correct and shows that they really do not understand the 5 dynasties 10 kingdoms period, for one thing there was more than one emperor also it is listed in a noncontiguous order. Add to that most dynasties are considered to be form foreign invaders. Unless they are considered Han people they are thought of a foreign.
As for the animal styles, what I am seeing in the video looks more like Shaolin 5 animals. This is not to be confused with other animal styles or animal posture or form names in other CMA styles.
I'm with you on this one. For me I don't assign personalities to animals, just for the simple fact that in nature, the personality of animals varies from animal to animal. For me I try to capture the spirit and energy in which an animal does things. So for my tiger styles I think of my strikes like a tiger hunting, concealed in the grass while stalking it's pray. The strikes are quick and powerful and they come from "unconventional positions" that hide the striking hand. In other words the strikes are not like jabs or hay-makers that can be seen. Tigers strike and grab,I read their five animals bit, and their section on crane, I don't like assigning personalities. I don't feel that it is about trying to become the animal. We are people, we have certain natural weapons as people, and those natural weapons are different from what animals have. However, animals can give us insights to develop the use of our natural weapons to a higher level. This is a physical education, but it is not trying to become the animal. In Tibetan crane, the crane has given insights into efficient use of the body, but we still move and fight as people.
Fox and tiger would win. This crane is too slow lolCrane vs Fox and Crane vs Tiger.....
If it were this crane.....
I think the outcome is pretty easy to figure out
Isn't that the one that Schwartzenegger used to destroy a Los Angeles neighborhood in Terminator 3?Crane vs Fox and Crane vs Tiger.....
If it were this crane.....
I think the outcome is pretty easy to figure out