Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll suggest to teach application first. You can teach basic later on. IMO, if you start with the basic, it may be too boring for most of your students.I'm thinking of giving private lessons.
So.... I am your first student... I show up for the first lesson... what am I going to learn? What can I expect to learn in 6 months? 1 year? 5 years?I have no curriculum or ideas on what and how to teach.
That's an excellent question to ask during the 1st day of the class.So.... I am your first student... I show up for the first lesson... what am I going to learn? What can I expect to learn in 6 months? 1 year? 5 years?
2 men drills is your answer.I'm unsure of how I would teach someone the methods I am familiar with.
The reason I asked the question is that you may at some point, have that first student wanting to train.... now what? Before you begin teaching... maybe figure out what exactly you will be teaching. You have some good questions there, about what exactly to teach. I would suggest figuring out what you are going to teach and how you going to move students along before you start teaching.I'm stuck there, hehe I'm unsure of how I would teach someone the methods I am familiar with. Should I impart each one separately or mix them to create my own system and rename it?
If I were to teach each style separately and traditionally, I would need permission from the head instructors of each, in addition to paying organization fees ETC.
alternatively I may combine the strongest elements from each one. However, there is still the issue of what to do if a student wants to seek rank, etc.
You have to come up with your curriculum first. And before that, determine if you are teaching a curriculum are not. Don't look for a student until you've done that.I'm stuck there, hehe I'm unsure of how I would teach someone the methods I am familiar with. Should I impart each one separately or mix them to create my own system and rename it?
If I were to teach each style separately and traditionally, I would need permission from the head instructors of each, in addition to paying organization fees ETC.
alternatively I may combine the strongest elements from each one. However, there is still the issue of what to do if a student wants to seek rank, etc.
Your teacher taught you information. The information is yours. You should have the freedom to pass down to whoever that you want to pass.For instance, each student would be required to pay an organizational fee to the style they choose to train in, and I would be required to keep track of their dues, etc. VS teaching a single, purposeful instruction for a single charge, etc.
Sounds like you need to first figure out what it is that you are going to teach. That is step one. All your effort right now, should be focused on that question. This answer will be the key to how you proceed.True and completely agree, but some organizations/styles are very strict about how you teach the style or keep close tabs on you. Some organizations do not want you to teach the system in conjunction with other styles, and they also want the org fees.
Thats my head ache if I chose to teach the systems individually, plus more time will need to be allotted to teach each one
If you're not giving out certificates from that organization, then none of this is true.My dilemma is how to teach all of those elements without having to jump through hoops to stay traditional or get approval from each style's head instructor. I think each style with which I am familiar has something to contribute.
For instance, each student would be required to pay an organizational fee to the style they choose to train in, and I would be required to keep track of their dues, etc. VS teaching a single, purposeful instruction for a single charge, etc.