[FONT="]i have been studying tae kwon do for roughly 10 years. i attained the rank of second dan in 1995 and took around 10 years off. recently i realized when i went to another school to continue my third (the dojong i was studying closed and the master opened started his own korean food restaurant.) i was told my degrees wernt valid there. i was 18 back then and didnt know such things about official kukiwon.
im solving that but i have a few questions.
one. i know tae kwon do is a very effective art. it has a very long history and my old master, YI was one of the best. he could take on anyone. he did. i heard of him walking into other dojongs and defeating other masters of other styles. this was in the 70s. why did instructors change the art so much since the 90s.
i see black belts in tae kwon do keep getting have been wiped out consistently in mix martial arts competitions K-1, pride fighting, or UFC. why is that because i know it is effective.
my second question, what happened to the united states tae kwon do union and what is this USA tae kwon do?
well one more question, where can i find the results from the first USTU junior Olympic competition. where did it take place it?[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT]
im solving that but i have a few questions.
one. i know tae kwon do is a very effective art. it has a very long history and my old master, YI was one of the best. he could take on anyone. he did. i heard of him walking into other dojongs and defeating other masters of other styles. this was in the 70s. why did instructors change the art so much since the 90s.
i see black belts in tae kwon do keep getting have been wiped out consistently in mix martial arts competitions K-1, pride fighting, or UFC. why is that because i know it is effective.
my second question, what happened to the united states tae kwon do union and what is this USA tae kwon do?
well one more question, where can i find the results from the first USTU junior Olympic competition. where did it take place it?[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT]