Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sounds about rightthat..........................is gross. :vu::jaw-dropping::barf::whip::xtrmshock:eye-popping::anic::erg:
It is gross, it is disgusting because it is two entirely different species of mammals we're talking about here. Also to the human psyche it's been ingrained as disgusting because way back when in the times of Moses and even before Abraham it was considered a mortal sin. Orthodox Jewish law dictates that both the human and animal must be put to death IMMEDIATELY. So when you have centuries of that dogma being spread around and not just on the Judaism and Christian faiths but even Muslims find this as a crime punishable by death. I'm sure that even eastern faiths have laws and dogma condemning this act and probably make it punishable by death as well. Why? Because it's wrong.
On a psychological level, yes, there is something very wrong with that guy's wiring (and any one else who consents to sexual acts with animals), or cranial chemical make up. Humans are the only animals on the planet who actually and actively try to copulate with other species (Capitan Kirk not-with-standing). Pictures of cross species mating are actually simulating & not really trying to "mate".
To say that "he was born that way" is a huge misstatement. If this were true then it would be acceptable to us deep in our own psyches the same way that same gender sex is acceptable, though not always condoned.
My guess is that he was taught in some way or another to do this act. Read about it, heard about it, saw it on one of those weird porno sites on the net or what/where/however! Just nobody is going to come forward saying "yeah, I told him about it." Or some other reason that he made this choice, but BORN? No, absolutely not.
It's sheep round our way too. I don't think anyone has ever been convicted though. Lots of jokes about it which I'd probably better not post....well alright just one, Why do Scotsmen wear kilts? Coz the sheep got used to the sound of zippers......
.
Well it's like: "Did you know that they've found a second use for sheep in Wyoming? It's called... wool!". First thing that made me laugh all day, thanks.Originally Posted by Tez3
It's sheep round our way too. I don't think anyone has ever been convicted though. Lots of jokes about it which I'd probably better not post....well alright just one, Why do Scotsmen wear kilts? Coz the sheep got used to the sound of zippers......
Why? Because it's wrong.
To say that "he was born that way" is a huge misstatement. If this were true then it would be acceptable to us deep in our own psyches the same way that same gender sex is acceptable, though not always condoned.
Oh, and for the inevitable chuckleheads: I am not into animal sex, nor do I approve of it. I would just like there to be some rationality behind the arguments more compelling than "ick!".
A lion and a tiger are basically the same species just different types of the same species... cats! Felines.That's a tautology. Why is it wrong? Certainly not because it is "unnatural" as you seem to imply (although not true, cross-species matings do happen. Ever heard of a liger?). Plenty of things are unnatural that are not wrong, including antibiotics, nylon and space travel.Originally Posted by MA-Caver
Why? Because it's wrong.
Basically you're not going to see a zebra and a waterbuffalo mixing it up anytime soon, though they're similar they're different species; equine and bovine. That is what I'm talking about. One could argue that someone from Asia or Africa or an even an Australian Aborigine is a different species from a European/American Caucasian but they're both STILL human! You've heard of cockapoos haven't you? The cross between a cocker-spaniel and a poodle? But I'll be damned surprised if you show me a Persian-shepard; a cross between a persian cat and a german shepard. It doesn't happen. Why because genetically it won't happen... naturally without outside laboratory assistance. So c'mon, please, it's not tautology okay? It's a biological fact.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liger The liger is a hybrid cross between a male lion and a female tiger (i.e, Panthera leo × Panthera tigris[1]). A liger resembles a lion with diffused stripes. They are the largest cats in the world, although the Siberian Tiger is the largest "pure" taxon. Ligers and tigers enjoy swimming, whereas lions do not. A similar hybrid, the offspring of a male tiger and a female lion is called a tigon.
Rare reports have been made of tigresses mating with lions in the wild.[2] Such mating may have occurred when, in uncommon circumstances, tigers were forced into ranges inhabited by the Asiatic Lion, Panthera leo persica. However, it is generally held that such a combination of species in the wild would occur very rarely.[3] The present-day ranges of wild lions and tigers no longer overlap.[4]
That is a surface psychology that causes people to react in a certain manner towards a particular act. Some people are fine with two men/women having sex and others choose to be violently opposed to it, still others choose to keep their opinions to themselves. But their opinions do not weigh in the fact that because the two men/women are human into their equation. They're only looking at the similarity of their sexes.Originally Posted by MA-Caver
To say that "he was born that way" is a huge misstatement. If this were true then it would be acceptable to us deep in our own psyches the same way that same gender sex is acceptable, though not always condoned.
I don't see how that follows. Lots of people condemn same gender sex in the strongest possible terms, even using some of the same senses of disgust and "unnaturalness" to argue against it. How do you know that "deep down" they are really OK with it? If they are willing to beat a gay man to death for being gay, seems they are not OK with it.
. Well naturally there will be more compelling arguments beyond the initial "icks" "eww's" "grosss!" ... some folks need more time to get over the shocking (mental) image than others.Oh, and for the inevitable chuckleheads: I am not into animal sex, nor do I approve of it. I would just like there to be some rationality behind the arguments more compelling than "ick!".
Thank you. My point... it's psychological.It also has to do with motive and ability....Humans are the only animals that really have a MOTIVE to have sex with anything that moves. We do it for enjoyment. Most of the animal kingdon does it for reproduction (as far as we know). We also have the ABILITY to pull it off. A zebra and a waterbufflo aren't going to get it on because things just aren't in the right place....and I really dont' think that they get along. Humans are pretty creative, we'll find a way to make it work.