Good questions and great points. Thank you very much gentlemen. I get these types of questions and comments all the time. The general public is not accustomed to seeing extensive Korean weaponry. The main Korean arts one sees are TKD and Hapkido. Traditionally, not a whole lot of weapons (certainly w/TKD).
I was very fortunate (and determined I might add), to learn Korean arts that were comprehensive and included more advanced and detailed weapon skills. It is a fact that I also trained in Philipino and Indonesian arts as well. Even a modestly trained eye can catch that. By the same token, you would need an eye trained in Korean arts with extensive weapons to recognize the diversity and similarities in the movements. And the truth of the matter is that the vast majority of my weapon training came from Korean martial arts. This is where I learned all the fundamentals and names and so on.
The general public here in the US rarely sees, if ever, arts such as Do Hap Sool, Sun Mu Do, Hwarang Do (I learned 4 versions of this art), and Kuk Sool (I learned 2 versions of this art), and some others that I was fortunate to be exposed to. And to my pleasant surprise, I found many of the basic fundamentals and concepts were the same in the other arts that I studied. For example, Kali systems have several versions of numbering the basic strikes. Number one may be a horizontal forehand strike, number two, a horizontal backhand, and may be followed by three and four uppercut and downward strikes. In the Korean arts I learned these were identified (in this exact sequence) by the angle of attack or defense. In this case, they are simply 90 degree strikes, which make a plus sign pattern.
It was similarities such as this that made expanding and absorbing other systems into my training that much easier. These were all incorporated into a larger matrix of skills in our art of Modern Farang Mu Sul. As a modern art, we do not restrict knowledge, yet stay true the roots of the art, which in this case is a Korean art. If I had come from a Japanese or Chinese based system, I'm sure we would have done the same. We are a product of my upbringing, personality and the needs of the world today.
And getting to the questions of the Presas brothers, yes, absolutely. I feel blessed to have had training by both GM Remy and GM Ernesto Presas. To me two of the jewels of the arts on this planet. Once I came back from Korea in 1982, I was very thirsty to expand my skills and realized that living in San Francisco alone was a gift, as it is a veritable “Mecca” of martial arts, and great teachers. I “majored” in Korean arts, but was always open to train with anyone, regardless of “style or country of origin”. It was around 1994 that I decided to really expand my Korean weapon skills with official training in Philipino and Indonesian arts. I was happy to have trained with so many amazing friends and teachers such as, Guru Larry Hartsell, Sigung Art Gitlin, Guru William De Thouars, Guru Roberto Torres, Guru Carlito Bonjok, and so many others. Interesting to note is that with our knife skills, even though it is based on Korean (and these other arts), the bottom line is the training I received from growing up in the Bayview / Hunters Point district of San Francisco, and the knife skills I learned in Mexico, that form the main base of our skill set. This is where the rubber met the road for me personally. This will leave a deep impression on anyone.
And as far as the tiger claw knife, again, the main basics I learned in Korea. Here are a couple of pictures of training in Korea, with some of the most unusual weapons I had ever seen (including various forms of “tiger claws”).
http://www.dsystem.com/images/DHS22DblEdgSwrdHookHatchet.html
http://www.dsystem.com/images/DHS23BlowDarts.html
http://www.dsystem.com/images/DHS04BlkBltTest.html
Alright, I didnÂ’t mean to write a newspaper here. I hope this sheds some light for you all. Thank you once again for the positive remarks and great questions.
With much respect and brotherhood,
[FONT="]Kuk Sa Nim[/FONT]