This is from a article on the BBC site, which starts off with a good public service piece:
But the point I'd like to bring up is this:
Should using encryption imply that you are up to no good? Does closing the blinds on your front window mean you are probably doing something illegal?
What privacy rights should we have on line? If you send a encrypted message should that immediately send up red flags that you are up to no good?
I'm kind of of the opinion that all data transferred between two computers should be encrypted by default...
First though, an apology. File sharing is not theft. It has never been theft. Anyone who says it is theft is wrong and has unthinkingly absorbed too many Recording Industry Association of America press releases. We know that script line was wrong. It was a mistake. We're very, very sorry.
But the point I'd like to bring up is this:
At the moment, there's little enough encrypted data flying around that using encryption for villainous purposes would just attract attention to yourself. But in the swamp of encryption that's in prospect, that will no longer be the case.
Should using encryption imply that you are up to no good? Does closing the blinds on your front window mean you are probably doing something illegal?
What privacy rights should we have on line? If you send a encrypted message should that immediately send up red flags that you are up to no good?
I'm kind of of the opinion that all data transferred between two computers should be encrypted by default...