Forwarding from Grandmaster Young In Cheon.
*****
I have written an article about my feelings of the electronic hogus in
korean that is being published on Mookas.com. The article is fairly long
and will be posted in 3 sections. Unfortunately, my english is not good and
it is in korean only but my student Phillip Yun has translated first part.
If you would like the korean version I can email it to you the pdf. Please
send request to [email protected]
March 24, 2011
The use of Electronic Body Protector in the Olympic can be the end of
Taekwondo as we know it. I was inspired by the recent mistakes made by
lajust during the Korean Olympic Team trials to write this article. I have
witnessed many faults of... the EBP in tournaments other than the Korean
National Trials.
I have written numerous articles against the EBP, but they had not been
published. I wish to publicize the numerous problems that the EBP holds to
the Taekwondo community.
The consensus regarding the EBP is that it is necessary to prevent bias and
corruption of the referees, but I beg to differ:
First, I believe that the partiality of the scoring in matches has not
improved since the introduction of the EBP.
I see the EBP as more of a scapegoat for the faults of the referees. In
addition, I feel that the techniques in Taekwondo have deteriorated by
trying to comply with the new style that the EBP has created for Taekwondo.
For example, the EBP is available for use for children older than 8. It is
obviously unfitting that a mere child, on which even a regular chest
protector would be considered heavy, is wearing an EBP, which is
significantly heavier than the regular chest protector.
The cost is certainly another issue to be considered. The entire set costs
thousands of dollars, and yet, a personal EBP is not allowed for use for
competitions. Thus, a competitor would have to pay $45 for the sensor socks,
$20 for the EBP rental fee and the competition registration fee.
Second, has the scoring become more accurate and fair since the introduction
of the EBP? This device only detects kicks to the body, which is a miniscule
portion of Taekwondo Sparring Techniques. The majority of the scoring is
still done by referees, such as turning kicks, head kicks, punches and
warnings.
I believe that the EBP has not performed even 50% up to its expectations.
Rather, it has reversed the improvements in techniques of Taekwondo with its
inadequate capabilities. It is truly peculiar to see that such a strange
technique would register as a point, which sometimes would determine the
champion of Taekwondo.
Some might even start calling Taekwondo foot fencing. There are obvious
differences between fencing and Taekwondo. Electronic systems in fencing is
justified by the fact that, unlike the kicks in Taekwondo, the movements in
fencing are so fast to the point where a valid point is hardly detectable to
the human eye. The electronic scoring system, however, serves a different
purpose for Taekwondo. Instead of performing duties that humans cant, it is
merely acting as an impartial medium.
The judges are still responsible for 80% of the calls made during a match.
Simply pinning the responsibility for erroneous calls on a scapegoat (EBP)
will definitely not solve the problem of corruption and bias.
Of course, the blemished reputation of the partiality of taekwondo has been
caused by only a small minority of corrupt referees. I happen to know that
the remaining majority of referees dedicate their utmost judgment and
passion to be fair as possible. I propose that the judges be evaluated by
their performance regarding the fairness and accuracy of each match.
I had spoken to a representative of an EBP company regarding the necessity
of EBP in Taekwondo, but he simply digressed after stating that improvements
are constantly being made through research. I am disturbed by the very
notion that Taekwondo is being used as a business for these companies. If
any of these companies were to seriously damage the reputation and ideals of
Taekwondo, whos to blame but ourselves?
Why is it that boxing, baseball, soccer and other sports prefer humans over
electronic systems? Erroneous decisions are simply a natural aspect of a
sport, which contributes to the excitement of Taekwondo.
Part 2 & 3 to be continued...
Written by: Master Young In Cheon
2000 USA Olympic Team Head Coach
1990-2002 US National Team Coach , Collegiate Team Coach
*****
I have written an article about my feelings of the electronic hogus in
korean that is being published on Mookas.com. The article is fairly long
and will be posted in 3 sections. Unfortunately, my english is not good and
it is in korean only but my student Phillip Yun has translated first part.
If you would like the korean version I can email it to you the pdf. Please
send request to [email protected]
March 24, 2011
The use of Electronic Body Protector in the Olympic can be the end of
Taekwondo as we know it. I was inspired by the recent mistakes made by
lajust during the Korean Olympic Team trials to write this article. I have
witnessed many faults of... the EBP in tournaments other than the Korean
National Trials.
I have written numerous articles against the EBP, but they had not been
published. I wish to publicize the numerous problems that the EBP holds to
the Taekwondo community.
The consensus regarding the EBP is that it is necessary to prevent bias and
corruption of the referees, but I beg to differ:
First, I believe that the partiality of the scoring in matches has not
improved since the introduction of the EBP.
I see the EBP as more of a scapegoat for the faults of the referees. In
addition, I feel that the techniques in Taekwondo have deteriorated by
trying to comply with the new style that the EBP has created for Taekwondo.
For example, the EBP is available for use for children older than 8. It is
obviously unfitting that a mere child, on which even a regular chest
protector would be considered heavy, is wearing an EBP, which is
significantly heavier than the regular chest protector.
The cost is certainly another issue to be considered. The entire set costs
thousands of dollars, and yet, a personal EBP is not allowed for use for
competitions. Thus, a competitor would have to pay $45 for the sensor socks,
$20 for the EBP rental fee and the competition registration fee.
Second, has the scoring become more accurate and fair since the introduction
of the EBP? This device only detects kicks to the body, which is a miniscule
portion of Taekwondo Sparring Techniques. The majority of the scoring is
still done by referees, such as turning kicks, head kicks, punches and
warnings.
I believe that the EBP has not performed even 50% up to its expectations.
Rather, it has reversed the improvements in techniques of Taekwondo with its
inadequate capabilities. It is truly peculiar to see that such a strange
technique would register as a point, which sometimes would determine the
champion of Taekwondo.
Some might even start calling Taekwondo foot fencing. There are obvious
differences between fencing and Taekwondo. Electronic systems in fencing is
justified by the fact that, unlike the kicks in Taekwondo, the movements in
fencing are so fast to the point where a valid point is hardly detectable to
the human eye. The electronic scoring system, however, serves a different
purpose for Taekwondo. Instead of performing duties that humans cant, it is
merely acting as an impartial medium.
The judges are still responsible for 80% of the calls made during a match.
Simply pinning the responsibility for erroneous calls on a scapegoat (EBP)
will definitely not solve the problem of corruption and bias.
Of course, the blemished reputation of the partiality of taekwondo has been
caused by only a small minority of corrupt referees. I happen to know that
the remaining majority of referees dedicate their utmost judgment and
passion to be fair as possible. I propose that the judges be evaluated by
their performance regarding the fairness and accuracy of each match.
I had spoken to a representative of an EBP company regarding the necessity
of EBP in Taekwondo, but he simply digressed after stating that improvements
are constantly being made through research. I am disturbed by the very
notion that Taekwondo is being used as a business for these companies. If
any of these companies were to seriously damage the reputation and ideals of
Taekwondo, whos to blame but ourselves?
Why is it that boxing, baseball, soccer and other sports prefer humans over
electronic systems? Erroneous decisions are simply a natural aspect of a
sport, which contributes to the excitement of Taekwondo.
Part 2 & 3 to be continued...
Written by: Master Young In Cheon
2000 USA Olympic Team Head Coach
1990-2002 US National Team Coach , Collegiate Team Coach