- Joined
- Feb 11, 2003
- Messages
- 9,998
- Reaction score
- 206
This is purely theoretical and hypothetical, but its amazing what you think of when you are bored...
Assume a guy is speeding. Cop sees him, pulls out behind him, chases him down, runs his plates, then lights up his cherrys and pulls him over.
The cop is ALSO guilty of speeding. Why is it OK for him to break the law??? Because he has a badge? Ok... theorectically if its ok for him to do so (speed to catch a speeder) then in court, shouldnt the defense that you were speeding to catch another speeder that you intended to place under citizens arrest be just as valid??? And if not, than isn't it true that the cops are above the law?
I started thinking about this while standing in line outside a local Venue in chicago... a cop came and told everyone in line to move... someone commented about it, and I said "Yea, Damn the man keepin us down!" and the first guy said "Dont say that too loud, the cops around here are likely to shoot you for it!" To which I replied "with what? Guns are ILLEGAL in chicago!" Now of course I was JOKING, but i got to thinking about it, if owning Guns are illegal, and by criminalizing guns you have effectivly removed them from the hands of the criminals (as the Mayor MUST believe, since he is the one who made that law) then why does law enforcement need them??? Now of course, I know the truth, which is, the criminals STILL have them, only the law abiding citizens gave them up... But the cops get an "exception" to that law, and i started thinking... the only "reasonable" reason I could see is that cops can ignore the laws that everyone else has to follow is so they can PREVENT and PUNISH crime, and that led to the speeding question... and the conclusion that it should be ok for us too if we are trying to prevent crime... Ugh... my head hurts.
Assume a guy is speeding. Cop sees him, pulls out behind him, chases him down, runs his plates, then lights up his cherrys and pulls him over.
The cop is ALSO guilty of speeding. Why is it OK for him to break the law??? Because he has a badge? Ok... theorectically if its ok for him to do so (speed to catch a speeder) then in court, shouldnt the defense that you were speeding to catch another speeder that you intended to place under citizens arrest be just as valid??? And if not, than isn't it true that the cops are above the law?
I started thinking about this while standing in line outside a local Venue in chicago... a cop came and told everyone in line to move... someone commented about it, and I said "Yea, Damn the man keepin us down!" and the first guy said "Dont say that too loud, the cops around here are likely to shoot you for it!" To which I replied "with what? Guns are ILLEGAL in chicago!" Now of course I was JOKING, but i got to thinking about it, if owning Guns are illegal, and by criminalizing guns you have effectivly removed them from the hands of the criminals (as the Mayor MUST believe, since he is the one who made that law) then why does law enforcement need them??? Now of course, I know the truth, which is, the criminals STILL have them, only the law abiding citizens gave them up... But the cops get an "exception" to that law, and i started thinking... the only "reasonable" reason I could see is that cops can ignore the laws that everyone else has to follow is so they can PREVENT and PUNISH crime, and that led to the speeding question... and the conclusion that it should be ok for us too if we are trying to prevent crime... Ugh... my head hurts.