bowing to buddah variations

jaybacca72

Blue Belt
Founding Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2001
Messages
232
Reaction score
1
Location
ontario CANADA
was wondering how others do this technique and what variations that have come about and possible what if grafting that has been discovered.
later
jay :partyon:
 
jaybacca72 said:
was wondering how others do this technique and what variations that have come about and possible what if grafting that has been discovered.
later
jay :partyon:
To be honest, I haven't been asked to perform that tech in about fifteen years. I do insert the elbow thingy into "sleeper". :)
Sean
 
We do bowing to budda as follows. The starting position is left knee down. The attack is a thrusting front ball kick. Execute an inward block for kick. Then we advance the right leg (about 6" or so) and drag up the left leg while performing a left uppward palm/claw to the groin along with an uppward elbow to the solarplexus (to check head butt) then pull the scrotum back towards you with your claw and sandwich it with a downward backnuckle strike. Then if you wanted to, (although I doubt he would still be there after the groin shots).you could switch-up your feet to left cat as you transition into prance of the tiger.
Hope this helps. George
 
jaybacca72 said:
was wondering how others do this technique and what variations that have come about and possible what if grafting that has been discovered.
later
jay :partyon:
I teach this technique for a secondary right roundhouse kick, as you are down on one knee, of course.

I use a left extended outward block to the ankle, simultaneous with a right forearm block that guides along the opponent's leg, making sure to step-drag as I block. The right upward elbow to the groin is executed as I move up the opponent's leg, borrowing force.

Jamie Seabrook
www.seabrook.gotkenpo.com
 
There's a lot of variants of this technique but we should remember it was taken from Form 4.

I learned it for a front kick, as being on one knee it may be hard to stay upright when blocking a roundhouse kick. Mr. Seabrook, what do you mean by "secondary" roundhouse kick?

One noteable about why Bowing to Buddha is in Form 4 where it is:

The hand combinations are - upward heelpalm claw (grab) followed by a downward back-knuckle strike.

The preceding technique used - downward heelpalm claw (grab) followed by an upward back-knuckle strike.

Looks like opposites to me ;) And here I thought the forms were a random collection of cool techniques all strung together :rolleyes: (j/k)
 
By secondary roundhouse kick, I mean that the opponent is in a left neutral bow and executing a right roundhouse kick. I also prefer a hammerfist to the groin as opposed to a back-knuckle, but in reality, either will work.

Bowing to buddha is basically the same technique as Raining Claw but on a lower line.

Jamie Seabrook
www.seabrook.gotkenpo.com
 
Bowing to Budda won't work against a roundhouse kick, from that position you have no bracing angle.BIGDOG
 
BIGDOG said:
Bowing to Budda won't work against a roundhouse kick, from that position you have no bracing angle.BIGDOG
Actually it does by shifting the "trail leg" to 4:30 to adjust the angle and provide the brace. Same foot manuever from 'Swinging Pendulum' prefixed to 'Bowing to Buddha' problem solved with a little open thought.
 
BIGDOG said:
Bowing to Budda won't work against a roundhouse kick, from that position you have no bracing angle.BIGDOG
I went through this technique step-by-step at the recent LTKKA Las Vegas Camp. That is how Larry Tatum teaches it, so I beg to differ.

Jamie Seabrook
www.seabrook.gotkenpo.com
 
Seabrook said:
I went through this technique step-by-step at the recent LTKKA Las Vegas Camp. That is how Larry Tatum teaches it, so I beg to differ.

Jamie Seabrook
I wouldn't second guess or disagree with Mr. Tatum.

But if you were down on one knee and you were attacked with the roundhouse kick, could you use that technique; or is there another that specifically addresses the situation?
 
BIGDOG said:
Bowing to Budda won't work against a roundhouse kick, from that position you have no bracing angle.BIGDOG
I just noticed that it wasn't only the LTKKA group that teach this technique off a right roundhouse kick.

In fact, I visited the KenpoNet, and see they have it written out for a right roundhouse kick. Then I visited a WKKA site, and see they have it written out for a right roundhouse as well. So then I thought, hmmm, maybe I should check Infinite Insights into Kenpo, vol. 5, pp 82-83, and interestingly, Ed Parker himself had it listed for a right roundhouse kick.

Two questions:

(1) What do you teach it for?
(2) Why, specifically, do you think it doesn't work for a right roundhouse kick?

Jamie Seabrook
www.seabrook.gotkenpo.com
 
Seabrook said:
I just noticed that it wasn't only the LTKKA group that teach this technique off a right roundhouse kick.
I think you're right.

I believe the tracy's may have a similar technique called "kneeling tiger" and might do it for a front kick.

Personally, I would hate to be on one knee facing a straight in kick from the front; but we'd block and counter as we could I suppose.
 
I know Big Dog is Pat Maguire who trains under Huk Planas, so I am VERY interested in knowing how the Huk Planas lineage teach the technique.

Thanks in advance.

Jamie Seabrook
www.seabrook.gotkenpo.com
 
Seabrook said:
I just noticed that it wasn't only the LTKKA group that teach this technique off a right roundhouse kick.

In fact, I visited the KenpoNet, and see they have it written out for a right roundhouse kick. Then I visited a WKKA site, and see they have it written out for a right roundhouse as well. So then I thought, hmmm, maybe I should check Infinite Insights into Kenpo, vol. 5, pp 82-83, and interestingly, Ed Parker himself had it listed for a right roundhouse kick.

Two questions:

(1) What do you teach it for?
(2) Why, specifically, do you think it doesn't work for a right roundhouse kick?

Jamie Seabrook
www.seabrook.gotkenpo.com
The over simple answer is that Huk Planas says it's not for a roundhouse.

As written it has the wrong bracing angle without adjustment.

I've had people kick me with full intent to play with this very question. For me it worked well against a front kick and it could be used against a roundhouse with minimal modification.

Jeff
 
Form 4, where the technique came from, again, to add technique content for all the colored belts, starts this technique by dropping to a knee with a DOWNWARD forearm block. How do you block a roundhouse kick with a DOWNWARD forearm block?

To me, it fits a (lifting) front kick a lot better, and you are braced for it.
After the DOWNWARD forearm block, the elbow is anchored to push the kicking leg to the side and create line of sight for the upward elbow to the groin.

A lot of people use the vertical forearm position jsut before the upward elbow as the block for a roundhouse, but as others have stated, you need to have a bracing angle to withstand the force of the roundhouse kick.
 
You're right if you change your angle it can be made to work.But Jamie you said as written. Go back and read it again. I was taught why it would'nt work on the mat with Mr. Planas(a painful experiance).BD
 
BIGDOG said:
You're right if you change your angle it can be made to work.But Jamie you said as written. Go back and read it again. I was taught why it would'nt work on the mat with Mr. Planas(a painful experiance).BD
I'm sure I could give you just as much of a painful experience on how it does work, as well as Blinding Sacrifice LOL.

DarK LorD
 
Two things to remember:
1. The techniques are written in the 'ideal phase' to study motion, but can modified slightly in most cases to handle other attacks and variables (What-if) when the time for actual application comes.
2. Techniques are often done in two versions the 'form version' and the 'non-form' version.

Example (1): 'Form 4' Bowing to Buddha uses a front kick because the previous technique (defensive cross) used a front kick. Bowing to buddha is an opposite of that technique but the attack remains the same to help students find the connection on their own. The hands travel in opposite directions, we move forward instead of backward, we start kneeling instead of standing, we grab the left leg instead of the right leg, etc. The 'non-form' version of bowing to buddha is often taught against a roundhouse kick to facilitate teaching off-angle-ing and moving up the circle from a kneeling position and executing dance of deaths takedown from a grounded position to 'turn the tables'

Example (2): 'Short 3' Crossing Talon teaches the hand pin wrist lock takedown instead of the strike takedown used in the technique. In the 'form version' the person is at a distance and we pin the hand to keep them from fully retreating. In the 'non form' version the range is closer and our focus is on canceling the punch by striking the right arm not on the opponent increasing the distance.

Example (3): 'Form 6' The first side of twisted rod has us advancing after a retreating attacker with a pistol while keeping contact with the gun bearing arm, while the second side is done in the 'technique version' against a stationary attacker.

Example (4): 'Long 3' Glancing Spear is missing the check with the lead hand to facilitate the glancing effect off of our wrist since we don't have the opponents shoulder to use in the form. The check is also missing to make it easier to see that the motion in Glancing Spear is reversed to another 'nearby technique' in the form.

Also don't forget that the book doesn't fight for you and neither does your instructor. So don't get so hung up on:

"Technique X doesn't work because it's not written that way."
"Technique X doesn't work because instructor Y said it doesn't."
"Technique X does work because Master Z teaches it that way."

The techniques work or don't work because of the application or lack of application of principles, not because the books or any person say they do/don't. So if a technique won't work figure out the WHY and do what fits within the principles of motion to make it work as necessary. The WHO said this and WHAT'S written doesn't matter if the principles that say WHY are adhered to.
 
After reading some of the post I can help but to think of a technique called five swords. In the ideal phase of the attack your opponent is throwing a right roundhouse punch. So what your saying BIGDOGG is that this technique will not work because I have no bracing angle?

Let me ask you a question. When you are training with your opponent and he throws a right roundhouse punch, do you what till the punch is at the end of it's appex? Or do you step in and close the gap and block (or strike Mr. Hale) the punch before he is able to generate some power?

With bowing to budda we have a roundhouse kick coming at us naturally if you do nothing at all, but put up a universal block, and allow your opponent to generate power he may be able to knock you over. We have to get in there and meet there action. The sooner X meets Y the greater the deflection.

I feel there is nothing wrong with working bowing budda using a front kick. But we should not discard the ideal phase of the technique. In the beginning didn't like Entwined Lance. I felt that my chop to the arm with an eye poke and a right leg check was not very effective. But I believe Mr. Parker created the system a certain way for a reason. There is a natural progression to the techniques. The way I view Entwined Lance now as a 3rd black is not the same as when I learned it. Some techniques may not have street value, but may have been created for other reasons.

Ray
 
Back
Top