Benchmade to re-release the Hobbit line?

Nifty knife, in the right, (hell even wrong) hands it could mean devastating wounds.
 
I hope the rumors are true.

Although I am not sure about using it as a civilian EDC, I really like the design for what it is intended for (a reverse grip fighter).

From what I understand, REKAT had trouble using the Hobbit name from Disney Co. for the knife. Perhaps they'll have to change the name?

Either way, no mattter what its called, I hope Mr. Taylor gets his design revived!

Paul
 
Hi there:

Actually the problem would have been with the Tolkien Estate and/or Saul Zaentz who own the rights to the works the name is drawn from. The use of the name Hobbit on a product without permission would have been a violation of copyright law in the US and some other countries.

Rich Curren
 
Emptyglass said:
Hi there:

Actually the problem would have been with the Tolkien Estate and/or Saul Zaentz who own the rights to the works the name is drawn from. The use of the name Hobbit on a product without permission would have been a violation of copyright law in the US and some other countries.

Rich Curren

Yea, I have no idea. This would have been pre-lord of the rings movies, so it may have had something to do with the 1970's cartoon version? I had heard that Disney had something to do with going after REKAT for the hobbit name, but it very well could have been a different entitiy...

Paul
 
arnisandyz said:
Rumors are out that Benchmade owns the patents to these knife designs of Bob Taylor originally made by REKAT and may be doing a production run soon! I handled one many years ago and always regretted not getting it. Its an excellent design.

Those of you who are not familiar with the hobbit go here http://www.snipercountry.com/InReviews/HobbitWarrior.asp
I bought a pocket hobbit from REKAT a couple years back. I looked everywhere for one and was actually told they weren't made anymore, when I managed to find Bob Taylor's phone number and I ordered one directly. It's a wonderful folder and I love the fact that it's designed for reverse grip and trapping. I've always wanted one of the Hobbit Warriors, though, heck of a wicked weapon. I'll have to get one if they reissue.
 
I definitely like the look of this blade. :) You say there was a folder? are there any pictures? I'm curious to see how that style of blade would go into a handle, and still have a decent draw.
 
I sold the Hobbit and the import copy for years, until the Tolkein lawyers contacted me and threatened legal action merely for selling at retail the product which was thusly named. I can still obtain the copy version and sell it but I cannot advertise it. These things are too HEAVY and I don't see much practical value, myself. Sorry to be a wet blanket. You could carry a good fighting knife and a loaded hideout polymer framed pistol for the same weight.


I prefer a medium weight Bowie, Kukri, or other fighting knife style. IMO a knife is not a pry bar or a way to split wood. If you want something with greater power and a tool, get a Junglee Skinning axe. If you want a razor sharp fighting knife there are many better designs, JMHO, having handled them all.
 
AC_Pilot said:
These things are too HEAVY and I don't see much practical value, myself. Sorry to be a wet blanket. You could carry a good fighting knife and a loaded hideout polymer framed pistol for the same weight.


While I agree the original Warrior was way too large to carry, the Hobbit Warrior was more practical. I am hoping that they produce the Pygmy Hobbit which will be even more compact.


This thread kind of goes hand-in-hand with the reverse grip thread. If you don't see value in reverse grip fighting, than most likely you won't see value in a knife designed for reverse grip.
 
I agree that this isn't a practical carry knife; mostly for legal reasons.

However, I am sure that in the right hands this can be deadly enough. Also, although it is designed for reverse grip, I could see many forward grip applications as well...

Paul
 
Tulisan said:
I agree that this isn't a practical carry knife; mostly for legal reasons.

However, I am sure that in the right hands this can be deadly enough. Also, although it is designed for reverse grip, I could see many forward grip applications as well...

Paul
If someone is in to reverse edge training, they are definitely the knife to carry. I prefer a forward grip myself, but I definitely am impressed by the rear edge trapping power of those vicious teeth. I bought the pocket hobbit mostly because I just wanted one. I don't carry it, preferring an Benchmade CQC7 and a CRKT M16-SRT. It's still an interesting conversation piece, the belt clip draw and the reverse openning are interesting, but require time to master.
 
sgtmac_46 said:
If someone is in to reverse edge training, they are definitely the knife to carry. I prefer a forward grip myself, but I definitely am impressed by the rear edge trapping power of those vicious teeth. I bought the pocket hobbit mostly because I just wanted one. I don't carry it, preferring an Benchmade CQC7 and a CRKT M16-SRT. It's still an interesting conversation piece, the belt clip draw and the reverse openning are interesting, but require time to master.

For a civilian, though, the knife isn't legally prudent to carry...

Paul
 
For what it's worth, Benchmade owns the patent for the "Rolling Lock" previously owned by R.E.K.A.T knives. That may be the source of the wishfull thinking/rumors around the Hobbit.
 
Tulisan said:
For a civilian, though, the knife isn't legally prudent to carry...

Paul
I'll give you that, it's a vicious looking blade and any jury it's shown too will wince. So will your attorney. Better a knife with a "utility look". The hobbit looks like it was made for one thing...opening a human body.
 
Back
Top