Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its true that before Whites, virturally every tribe used some version of this art.
Its even dep[icted in The last of the Mohicans 1992
No , the French developed Lacrosse after watching the native Indians.
But Ke-tee-hetch is a martial art, more deadly than any of the other ones I've practiced
Would like to know more about it. Do you have any info you can share about history, stylistics, methods of training, strategy of engagement, etc? Any information sources on the internet, or any books written about it?
No , the French developed Lacrosse after watching the native Indians.
But Ke-tee-hetch is a martial art, more deadly than any of the other ones I've practiced
I and apparently others here would be very interested in learning more about stick fighting. How it is more deadly, how does it compare to other martial arts you have studied? Please tell us more.
No , the French developed Lacrosse after watching the native Indians.
But Ke-tee-hetch is a martial art, more deadly than any of the other ones I've practiced
Well, the OP did say more deadly than what he had studied, so I'm not sure it's necessary to point out sword arts. IMO, the word "deadly" is usually used when "powerful" or "dangerous" would be more accurate.Sounded interesting until you said "more deadly" now my bs meter is going off. You realize there are plenty of arts that train with large pointy pieces of steel the sole intent on sticking inside or cutting off pieces of anothe person. "More deadly" is a misnomer and in my experience a sign of bs.
Yeah the qualifier "than I've studied" could mean anything really for all I know all op has studied is ukulele and his stick art. My point is that blades weapons arts exist and you can't really classify one as deadlier than another, moreso you can't compare an empty hand art to a weapons art in terms of deadliness. Any art can potentially be deadly, deadliness is not an acurate means of comparison. The ability to do what you say you can do is more important and a better point of comparison. Lots of people say they are deadly but those same people only ever show their ability to mime attacks on slow moving compliant partners.Well, the OP did say more deadly than what he had studied, so I'm not sure it's necessary to point out sword arts. IMO, the word "deadly" is usually used when "powerful" or "dangerous" would be more accurate.
I used to know a guy named John who said the exatc same thing about Irish Hurling.No , the French developed Lacrosse after watching the native Indians.
But Ke-tee-hetch is a martial art, more deadly than any of the other ones I've practiced
I used to know a guy named John who'd say the exact same things about Irish Hurling.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
WEW LAD stopstopstopstopstopstop. There is no such thing as "more deadly" in martial arts.more deadly than any of the other ones I've practiced
Depends on your definition of deadly. If it's "has the potential to kill", I would agree (ignoring arts that claim to be martial arts but are entirely ineffective). If it's "The ease with which you can kill", I would assume any weapon art would be "more deadly" than unarmed, and an art with guns is probably the most deadly. If your art goes over the proper way to launch a nuke, that would probably be the most deadly.WEW LAD stopstopstopstopstopstop. There is no such thing as "more deadly" in martial arts.