I agree with this article to an extent that I seldom do. This mirrors much of my own thinking, and it goes much further in scholarship and research than I have.
http://www.opendemocracy.net/roger-...dBlitzEmail&utm_content=201210&utm_campaign=0
If you read it (it's not short, but also not a trudge), you will need to remove your Bush or Obama buttons from your vest first. This is not a partisan hit-piece. I suspect the author is more pro-Obama than pro-Bush (he states it to some extent up front), but he deals fairly with both, I feel. Even where he feels Bush messed up, he prefaces it with an understanding of what background Bush's cabinet came from and what their expectations were. I think it's reasonably fair; but more importantly than being fair, I think his conclusions are accurate.
Read it with an open mind if you can (I am saying that gently, not mockingly). Tell me what you think.
http://www.opendemocracy.net/roger-...dBlitzEmail&utm_content=201210&utm_campaign=0
If you read it (it's not short, but also not a trudge), you will need to remove your Bush or Obama buttons from your vest first. This is not a partisan hit-piece. I suspect the author is more pro-Obama than pro-Bush (he states it to some extent up front), but he deals fairly with both, I feel. Even where he feels Bush messed up, he prefaces it with an understanding of what background Bush's cabinet came from and what their expectations were. I think it's reasonably fair; but more importantly than being fair, I think his conclusions are accurate.
Read it with an open mind if you can (I am saying that gently, not mockingly). Tell me what you think.