FearlessFreep
Senior Master
Britain releasd a report earlier this week concerning the economic impact of global warming and Blair has been critical of Bush on this regard.
The U.S contributes more greenhouse gases than any other country and yet is not part of the Kyoto agreement to cut greenhouse gases.
Now, without bothering to debate whether the theories of global warming are true or not or whethe rthe Kyoto agreement would really do any good or not, whay I'm curious about is this.
If the perceived impact of global warming is global and dire in scale and if the US is the largest contributer to that perceived threat and if the US refuses to recongize that threat while it can still be averted and take necceassary actions...
...at what point does the rest of the world decide to do something about it...and what form of action against the threat of the US would they take?
The U.S contributes more greenhouse gases than any other country and yet is not part of the Kyoto agreement to cut greenhouse gases.
Now, without bothering to debate whether the theories of global warming are true or not or whethe rthe Kyoto agreement would really do any good or not, whay I'm curious about is this.
If the perceived impact of global warming is global and dire in scale and if the US is the largest contributer to that perceived threat and if the US refuses to recongize that threat while it can still be averted and take necceassary actions...
...at what point does the rest of the world decide to do something about it...and what form of action against the threat of the US would they take?